Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Feb 14, 2019 6:37 pmThey probably weren't going to see much of anything in terms of tax revenue from Amazon. They might have been able to tax the workers, I guess. Not worth it.
Oh I'm sure they wanted quite a bit.
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Feb 14, 2019 6:37 pmThey probably weren't going to see much of anything in terms of tax revenue from Amazon. They might have been able to tax the workers, I guess. Not worth it.
After the 2020 census NY state is going to lose a house seat rumour has it our crazy eyed friend is going to get aced out. But dont call it gerrymandering cause according to dirty dick and English Flaggot only the evil GOP does that.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Thu Feb 14, 2019 6:16 pmI'm not convinced Democrats all the way up didn't screw the deal up and are happy to let her take the "victory."
1 from SF where he explicitly states he thinks it's shit whoever does it.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 08, 2018 10:40 amThe Trump effect is just gerrymandering on a national scale, the GOP has gerrymandered the whole fuckin' country now, they have been working for decades at the state legislature level, to gerrymander the whole kibbutz, and at this point, they have the Democrats boxed in, trapped, in a deep Blue, but very narrow distribution.
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:47 pmI'm not in any of those areas. Still not a democrat either. Keep beating that horse, slugger.clubgop wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:
I'm as annoyed by that as the gerrymandering by Republicans. It's two major shitstorms combining every election to fuck the People.
Weak loser excuses are for weak losers. Keep making them for your loser of a party. You gerrymander yourselves, you build and live in those bubbles.
You live a cloistered life, you should get out more.
Gerrymandering gets more results (54) but still no examples of SF being partisan and I have never used it before this post.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:04 pmIdk I feel like I mentioned it before once or twice. I've always viewed if favorably. Why shouldn't districts be drawn to accurately reflect their constituents?
You guys doing your best poltifact impressions, fact checking things I never alleged. Great Job. Undercover hack bitches gonna hack bitch. Proving my point right here. Wont attack the libs who do it or hold them to any account but theyll sure as shit attack the poster who points that out.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:12 pmINB4 we hear Cuntflop tell us that facts don’t matter because Communism and stuff.
Bezos probably found out about the local Union culture and wisely decided to have none of it.PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 14, 2019 6:08 pmBezos pulls out. Well, his company is....pulling out of plans for a HQ2 in New York.
AOC in her infinite stupidity cheered it as a victory.
Here's one of her statements:There is no $3 billion without Amazon. You don't get the tax money from a company that isn't going to be there to pay those taxes. I wonder if they are still trying to explain this to her."The city was paying for those jobs so frankly if we were willing to give Amazon so if we were willing to give away $3 billion for this deal, we could invest those $3 billion in our district ourselves if we wanted to. We could hire out more teachers, we can fix our subways, we can put a lot of people to work for that money if we wanted to."
I also heard a quick sound byte from her on Fox where she said something along the lines of "there were no guarantees from Amazon that these jobs would go to native New Yorkers" which is one of reasons she gave for opposing it. In other words, she is against people from somewhere else coming into her area and taking her people's jobs.