IQ measures the Brains capacity to recognize patters and solve problems...yes - genes play a large role in setting one's IQ....but the brain is like a muscle...it can be trained to function better over time.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:07 pmNo.
IQ does to measure education other than one's ability to read, but even that can be gotten around with a facilitator.
People just do not understand what general intelligence is. It's absolutely heritable.
Nobel Prize Not SJW-Proof, As Scientist Discovers
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Nobel Prize Not SJW-Proof, As Scientist Discovers
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Nobel Prize Not SJW-Proof, As Scientist Discovers
They play 100% role.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:10 pmIQ measures the Brains capacity to recognize patters and solve problems...yes - genes play a large role in setting one's IQ....but the brain is like a muscle...it can be trained to function better over time.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:07 pmNo.
IQ does to measure education other than one's ability to read, but even that can be gotten around with a facilitator.
People just do not understand what general intelligence is. It's absolutely heritable.
You are confusing education with intelligence.
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Nobel Prize Not SJW-Proof, As Scientist Discovers
No - you're the one whose confused....Intelligence (you probably mean knowledge) is what one knows.....IQ is one's capacity to problem solve....you can improve your brain function by literally exercising your brain...sure there's limits...just like body builder...but it still happens....mountains of research back that statement.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:11 pmThey play 100% role.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:10 pmIQ measures the Brains capacity to recognize patters and solve problems...yes - genes play a large role in setting one's IQ....but the brain is like a muscle...it can be trained to function better over time.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:07 pm
No.
IQ does to measure education other than one's ability to read, but even that can be gotten around with a facilitator.
People just do not understand what general intelligence is. It's absolutely heritable.
You are confusing education with intelligence.
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Nobel Prize Not SJW-Proof, As Scientist Discovers
The question in Africa is whether, and if so to what extent, their dramatically lower IQ is due to genetics.
My guess is a decent portion (the more we study genes the more we find that they control almost everything about us)....but I suspect a good portion is also due to environment...sort of like a snowball effect.... Lower latent IQ results in lower food yields which reduces brain growth/function every cycle...
What if genes only accounted for 5 IQ pts between the races?
My guess is a decent portion (the more we study genes the more we find that they control almost everything about us)....but I suspect a good portion is also due to environment...sort of like a snowball effect.... Lower latent IQ results in lower food yields which reduces brain growth/function every cycle...
What if genes only accounted for 5 IQ pts between the races?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Nobel Prize Not SJW-Proof, As Scientist Discovers
100% genetic
There is no magic in nature.
There is no magic in nature.
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Nobel Prize Not SJW-Proof, As Scientist Discovers
It's not magic - Brain power is defined mostly by structure....structure is largely based on genes...but also on environmental inputs...the more you use your brain the better the connections become...thus, the smarter you become....But it has limits...
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Nobel Prize Not SJW-Proof, As Scientist Discovers
You're saying that your current intelligence/problem-solving ability was determined entirely at birth. Ready to stand on that one?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Nobel Prize Not SJW-Proof, As Scientist Discovers
You do not understand what intelligence is. Go take graduate level cognitive science coursework and then we can hang.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:28 pmYou're saying that your current intelligence/problem-solving ability was determined entirely at birth. Ready to stand on that one?
There is no magic in nature. Intelligence is 100% genetic.
How you use it, whether you use it, etc., is another matter. The IQ test just measures something called g, which underlies all the various forms of intelligences (spatial, verbal, and so on). Culture and society probably plays a role in your ability to develop the g factor, but the g factor itself is inherited.
To wit: unfortunately, you cannot make yourself more intelligent. You can only learn new skills to better utilize the intelligence you have.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Nobel Prize Not SJW-Proof, As Scientist Discovers
Uh huh. And so having the opportunity to 'develop your g' has absolutely nothing to do with growing up in a first- vs third-world country...Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:34 pmYou do not understand what intelligence is. Go take graduate level cognitive science coursework and then we can hang.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:28 pmYou're saying that your current intelligence/problem-solving ability was determined entirely at birth. Ready to stand on that one?
There is no magic in nature. Intelligence is 100% genetic.
How you use it, whether you use it, etc., is another matter. The IQ test just measures something called g, which underlies all the various forms of intelligences (spatial, verbal, and so on). Culture and society probably plays a role in your ability to develop the g factor, but the g factor itself is inherited.
To wit: unfortunately, you cannot make yourself more intelligent. You can only learn new skills to better utilize the intelligence you have.
Never seen a more mealy-mouthed admission of defeat.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Nobel Prize Not SJW-Proof, As Scientist Discovers
The test does not measure that. It only measures the g factor.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:48 pmUh huh. And so having the opportunity to 'develop your g' has absolutely nothing to do with growing up in a first- vs third-world country...Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:34 pmYou do not understand what intelligence is. Go take graduate level cognitive science coursework and then we can hang.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:28 pm
You're saying that your current intelligence/problem-solving ability was determined entirely at birth. Ready to stand on that one?
There is no magic in nature. Intelligence is 100% genetic.
How you use it, whether you use it, etc., is another matter. The IQ test just measures something called g, which underlies all the various forms of intelligences (spatial, verbal, and so on). Culture and society probably plays a role in your ability to develop the g factor, but the g factor itself is inherited.
To wit: unfortunately, you cannot make yourself more intelligent. You can only learn new skills to better utilize the intelligence you have.
Never seen a more mealy-mouthed admission of defeat.