Not exactly. They clearly define Rural as less than 2500. So you want to claim "Urban Cluster" as rural, but they disagree.C-Mag wrote: ↑Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:43 pmBullshit the US Census Bureau classifies urban as 50,000 people. Don't move the goal posts.brewster wrote: ↑Thu Jan 03, 2019 7:16 pmAll available evidence. Make your case with evidence. And please don't move the goalposts by defining cities upward, historically even 10k people was a sizable city.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Jan 03, 2019 7:07 pmWhat makes you think cities are necessary for technological development?
https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ua/uafaq.html
The Census Bureau's urban-rural classification is fundamentally a delineation of geographical areas, identifying both individual urban areas and the rural areas of the nation. The Census Bureau's urban areas represent densely developed territory, and encompass residential, commercial, and other non-residential urban land uses. For the 2010 Census, an urban area will comprise a densely settled core of census tracts and/or census blocks that meet minimum population density requirements, along with adjacent territory containing non-residential urban land uses as well as territory with low population density included to link outlying densely settled territory with the densely settled core. To qualify as an urban area, the territory identified according to criteria must encompass at least 2,500 people, at least 1,500 of which reside outside institutional group quarters.
The Census Bureau identifies two types of urban areas:
Urbanized Areas (UAs) of 50,000 or more people;
Urban Clusters (UCs) of at least 2,500 and less than 50,000 people.
"Rural" encompasses all population, housing, and territory not included within an urban area.