-
Hanarchy Montanarchy
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Post
by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:51 am
Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:40 am
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:25 am
Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:11 am
Hanarchy is good a speaking new languages: he has English & cuck down perfectly. How about some NewSpeak, Hanny? Give us some of that.
People always misunderstand the danger of the Ingsoc attack on language. They reduced the number of words in order to control what people were capable of thinking. Adding specificity to words, or inventing new words does not carry the same risk. If people want to add layers of specificity to the word racist, I am fine with that as long as I still have a language to describe what 'racist' used to mean, and I do.
You must be able to identify your problems & your enemies succinctly. Torturing the language & redefining words is an Oral Illusion; i.e. liberty is a synonym for freedom and we have freedom so what are you going on about? Only White people can be racist so you’ll need a couple seconds to carefully describe what black people who do the same thing are called. All previously written books, plays, movies, etc. that use the word “racist” are henceforth only talking about white people. Black people have no word for their actions so they must not be doing them.
You are such a cuck.
Why can't you just say prejudiced or bigoted? We can get lost in the weeds over the changes in the definitions of words. People use moot and peruse wrong all the time, and words like mickle have more or less disappeared entirely. Oh well.
Trying to claw back the definition of the word 'racist' doesn't make much sense to me. If we agree that the real moral problem is the assault on individual sovereignty, you can make that case succinctly, and it really doesn't require arguing over who is or isn't racist.
To flip it around, it is a left truism that anti-black prejudice is responsible for black antisocial behavior. That argument doesn't rise or fall on the definition of racism. Neither does the argument for the moral superiority of enlightenment values.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
Martin Hash
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Post
by Martin Hash » Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:57 am
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:51 am
Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:40 am
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:25 am
People always misunderstand the danger of the Ingsoc attack on language. They reduced the number of words in order to control what people were capable of thinking. Adding specificity to words, or inventing new words does not carry the same risk. If people want to add layers of specificity to the word racist, I am fine with that as long as I still have a language to describe what 'racist' used to mean, and I do.
You must be able to identify your problems & your enemies succinctly. Torturing the language & redefining words is an Oral Illusion; i.e. liberty is a synonym for freedom and we have freedom so what are you going on about? Only White people can be racist so you’ll need a couple seconds to carefully describe what black people who do the same thing are called. All previously written books, plays, movies, etc. that use the word “racist” are henceforth only talking about white people. Black people have no word for their actions so they must not be doing them.
You are such a cuck.
Why can't you just say prejudiced or bigoted? We can get lost in the weeds over the changes in the definitions of words. People use moot and peruse wrong all the time, and words like mickle have more or less disappeared entirely. Oh well.
Trying to claw back the definition of the word 'racist' doesn't make much sense to me. If we agree that the real moral problem is the assault on individual sovereignty, you can make that case succinctly, and it really doesn't require arguing over who is or isn't racist.
To flip it around, it is a left truism that anti-black prejudice is responsible for black antisocial behavior. That argument doesn't rise or fall on the definition of racism. Neither does the argument for the moral superiority of enlightenment values.
Did you Google “bigot” or “prejudiced” before you decided they now mean racism?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
Martin Hash
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Post
by Martin Hash » Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:59 am
I’m fucking prejudiced every day. My address is 10411 NE 110th Circle 98662 if you want to come beat me up?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
Hanarchy Montanarchy
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Post
by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:11 pm
We can think about this another way.
If we are really engaged in a ideological war with progressives, what would you think of someone in a war that kept wasting resources trying to recapture a strategically unimportant asset?
You are welcome to die on the hill of 'blacks can be racist' if you like, but I think it is a damn shame.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
Hanarchy Montanarchy
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Post
by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:13 pm
Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:57 am
Did you Google “bigot” or “prejudiced” before you decided they now mean racism?
Well, now they
don't mean racism. That is the whole point.
They do, however, mean rather precisely what I am trying to describe when I use them.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
Martin Hash
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Post
by Martin Hash » Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:25 pm
By your definitions, I’m a prejudiced racist, so why should I even have a discussion with someone who belittles me? Really? All you do is call me names.
One of the ways I get people to leave this board is to write “Fuck you” every time they call me names. Is that the relationship you want with me?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:26 pm
Racist is just code for "white"
Diversity is code for "anti-white"
Equality is code for "anti-white male"
Religious tolerance is code for "anti-Christian"
My other degree is in Ingsoc
-
Hanarchy Montanarchy
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Post
by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:35 pm
Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:25 pm
By your definitions, I’m a prejudiced racist, so why should I even have a discussion with someone who belittles me? Really? All you do is call me names.
One of the ways I get people to leave this board is to write “Fuck you” every time they call me names. Is that the relationship you want with me?
The left has changed the definition of racism, and in doing so, have completely denuded it of its moral condemnation. When a leftist calls me a racist, it doesn't really bother me since I know their definition.
As for prejudice, it is, by definition, an intellectual failure, not a moral one. I am also prejudiced in all sorts of ways, but I try to accept data that disabuses me of ideas I have that aren't based on evidence. I assume you do the same.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
Martin Hash
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Post
by Martin Hash » Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:36 pm
Twits don’t understand that even though they may feel the inner glow of sanctimony for subjugating themselves to the self-righteous demands of others, that non-Twits just feel betrayed and insulted. The Twits say they don’t want to die on that hill but they’re making damn sure there is going to be a hill they die on.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
Hastur
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
- Location: suiþiuþu
Post
by Hastur » Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:37 pm
The most racist people I've met were all Arabs. Americans are good at joking about it though.
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck