SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

[StCapps]

As stupid as you think this story is at first glance, it's actually like a million times dumber than that once you dig into the details of it.

[Smitty-48]

Should probably have linked to, and quoted the sub-headline that preceded my quote:

https://www.bbc.com/news/52012242



So, it's not saying that the medicine that the couple ingested was the same as the one touted by Trump.

Trump didn't tout using the veterinary formula

the headline should read "man ingests the wrong medicine in a panic"

It wasn't even medicine. It was fish tank cleaner, and one ingredient of that fish tank cleaner was hydroxychlorqine, that wasn't even the ingredient that killed him.

Rly? Okay, I have no sympathy for those people, that is suicide ad absurdum

[Smitty-48]

Trump didn't tout using the veterinary formula

And the article isn't saying he did.

Whatever, I'm not going to get into partisan bun fights in the middle of the war, nvm

[StCapps]

Trump didn't tout using the veterinary formula

the headline should read "man ingests the wrong medicine in a panic"

It wasn't even medicine. It was fish tank cleaner, and one ingredient of that fish tank cleaner was hydroxychlorqine, that wasn't even the ingredient that killed him.

Rly? Okay, I have no sympathy for those people, that is suicide ad absurdum

It literally said "Not safe for human consumption" on the damn package, and they still took it. Dumbest couple ever.

[Smitty-48]

It wasn't even medicine. It was fish tank cleaner, and one ingredient of that fish tank cleaner was hydroxychlorqine, that wasn't even the ingredient that killed him.

Rly? Okay, I have no sympathy for those people, that is suicide ad absurdum

It literally said "Not safe for human consumption" on the damn package, and they still took it. Dumbest couple ever.

They literally deserved to die, by definition.

That's just too fucking weak to qualify for the Well Regulated Militia

[Montegriffo]

This is the only BBC news story I could find on it, and the only non-quote they write is:



Which... doesn't really look like an accusation or assigning of blame. I'm sure there are other stories that adopt that interpretation, though.

Yes but, BBC bad - Orange man good.

This instance is a prime example of that dynamic. BBC got the TDS real bad, it doesn't get any more TDS than that headline.

Except, as Bjorn pointed out there was no such headline. You have just succumbed to BBCDS like a good little Trump whisperer.

[BjornP]

It literally said "Not safe for human consumption" on the damn package, and they still took it. Dumbest couple ever.

Some people just don't trust their government to give them reliable information...

[Montegriffo]

It literally said "Not safe for human consumption" on the damn package, and they still took it. Dumbest couple ever.

Some people just don't trust their government to give them reliable information...

Well played.

[StCapps]

Yes but, BBC bad - Orange man good.

This instance is a prime example of that dynamic. BBC got the TDS real bad, it doesn't get any more TDS than that headline.

Except, as Bjorn pointed out there was no such headline. You have just succumbed to BBCDS like a good little Trump whisperer.

I suppose I did in this instance, but if I really had BBCDS, I would never admit to that and would claim to be totally unbiased against the BBC.

[StCapps]

It literally said "Not safe for human consumption" on the damn package, and they still took it. Dumbest couple ever.

Some people just don't trust their government to give them reliable information...

There is a difference, this was fish tank cleaner, of course it isn't safe for human consumption. You don't even need a label to tell you that, and if you do, you are really dumb, for real.

Good joke though.