I would bet money that, when you die, it will be 11 years away according to the "consensus".Fife wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:49 amTo understand the climate preachers I feel like I need to revisit Munster when things were lit like this.
New Yorker: We Can’t Prevent the Climate Apocalypse
Religious nuts gonna nut, I reckon. Some people just want to see the world burn.If you’re younger than sixty, you have a good chance of witnessing the radical destabilization of life on earth—massive crop failures, apocalyptic fires, imploding economies, epic flooding, hundreds of millions of refugees fleeing regions made uninhabitable by extreme heat or permanent drought. If you’re under thirty, you’re all but guaranteed to witness it.
2020 election
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: 2020 election
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: 2020 election
The Climate Anabaptists claim that they'll "ignore" the heretics, right?
Orthodoxy ain't in the ignoring business.
The science is settled.
Orthodoxy ain't in the ignoring business.
The science is settled.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: 2020 election
Yet you decide to take the side of one extreme anyway while pointing fingers at everyone else. Sad.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:02 amAll movements have their extremes.
Hardly Earth-shattering news.
One extreme makes over the top doomsday predictions while the other extreme claims it is all a big hoax.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: 2020 election
No, I'm not on the extreme, you won't find me alongside Extinction Rebellion shutting down Heathrow with drones next week (or whenever they're doing it).StCapps wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:49 amYet you decide to take the side of one extreme anyway while pointing fingers at everyone else. Sad.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:02 amAll movements have their extremes.
Hardly Earth-shattering news.
One extreme makes over the top doomsday predictions while the other extreme claims it is all a big hoax.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: 2020 election
Slightly less extreme than the most extreme, is still extreme. You ain't a fucking moderate on the issue, don't snow.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:01 amNo, I'm not on the extreme, you won't find me alongside Extinction Rebellion shutting down Heathrow with drones next week (or whenever they're doing it).StCapps wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:49 amYet you decide to take the side of one extreme anyway while pointing fingers at everyone else. Sad.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:02 amAll movements have their extremes.
Hardly Earth-shattering news.
One extreme makes over the top doomsday predictions while the other extreme claims it is all a big hoax.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: 2020 election
You're not extreme, but you believe white people should be denied, for example, straws because Chinese, Indians, and Africans pollute the oceans..
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: 2020 election
When his only solutions to the problem all involve government intervention and he calls himself an eco-fascist, that's pretty extreme.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: 2020 election
No, just the adults.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:21 amYou're not extreme, but you believe white people should be denied, for example, straws because Chinese, Indians, and Africans pollute the oceans..
Kids can have reusable straws.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: 2020 election
That's not true either. People should take personal responsibility. It's no good waiting for governments to pull their fingers out of their arse.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: 2020 election
There are environmental reasons for opposing nuclear energy. I don't personally support them but they have some validity.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.