Trump's SCOTUS

[Montegriffo]

How do you know that there is no crime to be investigated?
Do you think that attempted rape or sexual assault are not crimes?

...Amanda Farahany is a managing partner at Barrett & Farahany Law Firm in midtown Atlanta. She specializes in employment law and sexual harassment cases, and has taken interest in what's unfolding in Washington with Kavanaugh.

Although the statue of limitations for prosecution have long expired, Farahany says this still needs to be heard from both sides.....

https://www.cbs46.com/news/role-of-stat ... 7b34a.html

“Let’s spend taxpayer money investigating baseless criminal accusations over three decades old because they can lead to zero prosecutions” -Leftists

You see no value in trying to find out whether a prospective Supreme court judge sexually assaulted girls 30 years ago?

[Speaker to Animals]

Memo to Trump: fuck around with swamp people at your peril. Next time, don't fuck it up like this based upon what the neocon shitasses you have surrounded yourself with tell you to do.

QfT

"Garbage human beings" might have been overly charitable.

[DBTrek]

You see no value in trying to find out whether a prospective Supreme court judge sexually assaulted girls 30 years ago?

Nope.

Especially since the so-called victims had no interest in pursuing it themselves, until now. Looks like 30 years ago came and went, and nobody died. No one even called the cops. In fact, no one is even sure where or when the crimes occurred, or who really committed them.

So what are we investigating again?
Nothing?
Just derailing a SC nomination through insidious character assassination?
Ah, I see.

Pffft.

[Speaker to Animals]

How do you know that there is no crime to be investigated?
Do you think that attempted rape or sexual assault are not crimes?

...Amanda Farahany is a managing partner at Barrett & Farahany Law Firm in midtown Atlanta. She specializes in employment law and sexual harassment cases, and has taken interest in what's unfolding in Washington with Kavanaugh.

Although the statue of limitations for prosecution have long expired, Farahany says this still needs to be heard from both sides.....

https://www.cbs46.com/news/role-of-stat ... 7b34a.html

“Let’s spend taxpayer money investigating baseless criminal accusations over three decades old because they can lead to zero prosecutions” -Leftists

You see no value in trying to find out whether a prospective Supreme court judge sexually assaulted girls 30 years ago?

I want to investigate the fuck out of this no matter what happens. Both should provide testimony under oath. If neither of them admits to lying, then one of them lied under oath. Prove who lied and send him or her to prison.

[Montegriffo]

“Let’s spend taxpayer money investigating baseless criminal accusations over three decades old because they can lead to zero prosecutions” -Leftists

You see no value in trying to find out whether a prospective Supreme court judge sexually assaulted girls 30 years ago?

I want to investigate the fuck out of this no matter what happens. Both should provide testimony under oath. If neither of them admits to lying, then one of them lied under oath. Prove who lied and send him or her to prison.

Agreed.

[PartyOf5]

Do you want a situation where women are too frightened to make accusations for fear of being labelled as liars and whores if they dare speak out about being assaulted?

*cough* CLINTON *cough*

Ah, the "but Clinton defence".

If Clinton was guilty of rape then he should have been charged and prosecuted for it.

Two wrongs do not make a right.

From the same guy that brought up Jimmy Saville and Donald Trump pages earlier. Keep moving the goalposts, it's the only way you can compete.

[PartyOf5]

I want to investigate the fuck out of this no matter what happens. Both should provide testimony under oath. If neither of them admits to lying, then one of them lied under oath. Prove who lied and send him or her to prison.

I'd prefer that, but at this point I doubt either side can be proven. After 30 years it's going to end up with a list of witnesses on each side saying he did/didn't do it.

[Montegriffo]

*cough* CLINTON *cough*

Ah, the "but Clinton defence".

If Clinton was guilty of rape then he should have been charged and prosecuted for it.

Two wrongs do not make a right.

From the same guy that brought up Jimmy Saville and Donald Trump pages earlier. Keep moving the goalposts, it's the only way you can compete.

Except I'm not using their offences as a reason to not Investigate BK.

[Speaker to Animals]

I want to investigate the fuck out of this no matter what happens. Both should provide testimony under oath. If neither of them admits to lying, then one of them lied under oath. Prove who lied and send him or her to prison.

I'd prefer that, but at this point I doubt either side can be proven. After 30 years it's going to end up with a list of witnesses on each side saying he did/didn't do it.

After 30 years, the accuser better have his or her ducks in a row, because making a baseless allegation of rape you cannot prove just to derail somebody's life and career for politics deserves prison time.

If she is lying, what she did was far worse than rape.

All these women who lie about rape commit offenses with far greater impact on their victims' lives than any rape.

Appealing to the horror of rape does not appeal to me when people are defending an injustice far more horrible.

[Speaker to Animals]

I just personally experienced a girl getting drugged for an attempted rape. She did not report it immediately. No drug test to prove it.

Guess who is free to do it again..

Women should (1) not put themselves in these positions with men like that, and (2) for the love of God go straight to the police.

The police want to arrest rapists. Locking up a fucking rapist makes their shitty jobs worthwhile. You just have to get there soon so they can collect the evidence.