“Fuck the rules, whatever it takes....” -LeftistsDBTrek wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:34 amMontegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:26 am
How do you know that there is no crime to be investigated?
Do you think that attempted rape or sexual assault are not crimes?“Let’s spend taxpayer money investigating baseless criminal accusations over three decades old because they can lead to zero prosecutions” -Leftists...Amanda Farahany is a managing partner at Barrett & Farahany Law Firm in midtown Atlanta. She specializes in employment law and sexual harassment cases, and has taken interest in what's unfolding in Washington with Kavanaugh.
Although the statue of limitations for prosecution have long expired, Farahany says this still needs to be heard from both sides.....
https://www.cbs46.com/news/role-of-stat ... 7b34a.html
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
It wasn't just some all boys school. It was Georgetown Prep, heart of the privileged prick swamp.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:37 amRemember, Kavanaugh did NOT go to high school with these women; he went to an all—boys school. I’ll bet he was a virgin at 17, at least with women.
Mark Judge’s Memoir About Brett Kavanaugh’s High School Portrays a Culture of Aggression and Excessive Drinking
Memo to Trump: fuck around with swamp people at your peril. Next time, don't fuck it up like this based upon what the neocon shitasses you have surrounded yourself with tell you to do.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Now even our backwoods lawyers are hand-wringing over who is “privileged”.
The vocabulary war apparently ended before one side even knew it was being waged.
Next Fife will be lecturing us on what is “problematic” and “not ok”.
The vocabulary war apparently ended before one side even knew it was being waged.
Next Fife will be lecturing us on what is “problematic” and “not ok”.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
LOL at the hand-wringing. BK is a product of the swamp, and you had best believe that the other swamp creatures will pull the stops when it comes to taking down some hot shot with the wrong politics.
Kavanaugh was a bad choice, from the beginning, because he's part of the homogeneous herd.
Glenn Reynolds describes them as "front-row kids." Recommended: https://www.encounterbooks.com/features ... e-elitism/
Play swamp games, win swamp prizes.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Sounds “problematic”.
Swamp things definitely, like, “not ok”.
Derp.
Swamp things definitely, like, “not ok”.
Derp.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
/sigh
Look at the stuff about "front-row kids" in that link I graciously laid down for the peanut gallery.
I wonder if any of the pearls cast before the swine are ever even sniffed.
Look at the stuff about "front-row kids" in that link I graciously laid down for the peanut gallery.
I wonder if any of the pearls cast before the swine are ever even sniffed.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Ah, so instead of “too many whites” it’s “too many Ivy leavers”.
If only the enlightened tyrants would arrive and finally assign the proper demographic quotas to all the professions and school admissions.
But fuck roads. Asphalt is oppressive.
Hard being the only sober guy on the forum come Monday morning.
If only the enlightened tyrants would arrive and finally assign the proper demographic quotas to all the professions and school admissions.
But fuck roads. Asphalt is oppressive.
Hard being the only sober guy on the forum come Monday morning.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18667
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
If Kavanaugh was an anti-abortionist, Fife would be sucking his dick, as would half the people on this forum.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Not really trolling, more playing devils advocate.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Ah, the "but Clinton defence".PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:18 am*cough* CLINTON *cough*Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:55 amDo you want a situation where women are too frightened to make accusations for fear of being labelled as liars and whores if they dare speak out about being assaulted?
If Clinton was guilty of rape then he should have been charged and prosecuted for it.
Two wrongs do not make a right.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.