Trump's SCOTUS

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Zlaxer » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:42 am

DBTrek wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:34 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:26 am

How do you know that there is no crime to be investigated?
Do you think that attempted rape or sexual assault are not crimes?
...Amanda Farahany is a managing partner at Barrett & Farahany Law Firm in midtown Atlanta. She specializes in employment law and sexual harassment cases, and has taken interest in what's unfolding in Washington with Kavanaugh.

Although the statue of limitations for prosecution have long expired, Farahany says this still needs to be heard from both sides.....

https://www.cbs46.com/news/role-of-stat ... 7b34a.html
“Let’s spend taxpayer money investigating baseless criminal accusations over three decades old because they can lead to zero prosecutions” -Leftists

:roll:
“Fuck the rules, whatever it takes....” -Leftists

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:44 am

Martin Hash wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:37 am
Remember, Kavanaugh did NOT go to high school with these women; he went to an all—boys school. I’ll bet he was a virgin at 17, at least with women.
It wasn't just some all boys school. It was Georgetown Prep, heart of the privileged prick swamp.

Mark Judge’s Memoir About Brett Kavanaugh’s High School Portrays a Culture of Aggression and Excessive Drinking

Memo to Trump: fuck around with swamp people at your peril. Next time, don't fuck it up like this based upon what the neocon shitasses you have surrounded yourself with tell you to do.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by DBTrek » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:46 am

Now even our backwoods lawyers are hand-wringing over who is “privileged”.

The vocabulary war apparently ended before one side even knew it was being waged.

Next Fife will be lecturing us on what is “problematic” and “not ok”.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:53 am

DBTrek wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:46 am
Now even our backwoods lawyers are hand-wringing over who is “privileged”.

The vocabulary war apparently ended before one side even knew it was being waged.

Next Fife will be lecturing us on what is “problematic” and “not ok”.
LOL at the hand-wringing. BK is a product of the swamp, and you had best believe that the other swamp creatures will pull the stops when it comes to taking down some hot shot with the wrong politics.

Kavanaugh was a bad choice, from the beginning, because he's part of the homogeneous herd.

Glenn Reynolds describes them as "front-row kids." Recommended: https://www.encounterbooks.com/features ... e-elitism/

Play swamp games, win swamp prizes.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by DBTrek » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:55 am

Sounds “problematic”.
Swamp things definitely, like, “not ok”.

Derp.

Image
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:57 am

/sigh

Look at the stuff about "front-row kids" in that link I graciously laid down for the peanut gallery.

I wonder if any of the pearls cast before the swine are ever even sniffed.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by DBTrek » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:07 am

Ah, so instead of “too many whites” it’s “too many Ivy leavers”.

If only the enlightened tyrants would arrive and finally assign the proper demographic quotas to all the professions and school admissions.
But fuck roads. Asphalt is oppressive.

Hard being the only sober guy on the forum come Monday morning.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18667
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:11 am

If Kavanaugh was an anti-abortionist, Fife would be sucking his dick, as would half the people on this forum.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Montegriffo » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:21 am

Zlaxer wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:22 am
You guys realize no one is moving their positions no matter how much you "argue"....so really you're just venting at each other - We'll Monty is trolling - that's apparent.
Not really trolling, more playing devils advocate.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Montegriffo » Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:27 am

PartyOf5 wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:18 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:55 am
Do you want a situation where women are too frightened to make accusations for fear of being labelled as liars and whores if they dare speak out about being assaulted?
*cough* CLINTON *cough*
Ah, the "but Clinton defence".

If Clinton was guilty of rape then he should have been charged and prosecuted for it.

Two wrongs do not make a right.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image