Otern wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 12:53 amIf anything, this shows a weakness in the British justice system.
"Weakness".....that's one way to put it......










Otern wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 12:53 amIf anything, this shows a weakness in the British justice system.
Your definition of ''prove'' leaves a lot to be desired.Okeefenokee wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 1:33 am Monty's just a liar who gets off on seeing people brought to heel.
He pretends like he's coming down on the side of law and order, but that's complete horseshit.
If he was really what he's pretending to be, he wouldn't be pirating public television on an unlicensed tv.
If he was really what he's pretending to be, he wouldn't be excusing his government's decades long cover-up of thousands of rapes of young girls on inadequate funding while staring right in the face of the same government arresting people in the night for offensive tweets.
It doesn't matter how many times you slap down his horseshit defenses of what is being condemned, he'll just make up something else, because one lie is as good as another for a liar.
He calls it all a false conspiracy theory, so you prove it happened.
He abandons that, and says it wasn't a cover-up, so you prove it was.
He abandons that, and says it was just a lack of funding, so you prove that it wasn't.
On and on. One lie after another.
Next he'll go back to where he ended up last time and say all those girls were asking for it.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
So now I'm responsible for what someone else said?
That’s what I thought. So he’s actually in jail for what would be in the States, a parole violation.Otern wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 12:53 am Did Tommy Robinson break the law? He did film one of the defendants leaving a car and entering the court house. And he did verbally confront him of the crimes he's accused of. If that's illegal and contempt of court, sure, he broke the law. But that's not what he was arrested for, and it's not this incident that got him convicted for contempt of the court.
He was on a suspended sentence for contempt of the court one year ago. This is more clear cut. He brought a camera inside a court house, and filmed illegally. And it's this sentence being enforced when he was arrested now.
But, he was not arrested for contempt of court a few days ago. He was being jailed for contempt of court that happened last year, but he was arrested for disorderly conduct a few days ago. Not sentenced for disorderly conduct. And this is what's problematic. Because it's enough to simply be arrested, not necessarily guilty, to change the suspended sentence to actual prison time.
It should matter if he actually were guilty of disorderly conduct or not, but according to the law, it doesn't matter when you're on a suspended sentence. If anything, this shows a weakness in the British justice system.
More than a parole violation. A suspended sentence is a prison term suspended for a given time which can be applied in full if you break the law during that period. Basically he was let off a prison sentence on the provision that he stayed law abiding.GrumpyCatFace wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 9:35 amThat’s what I thought. So he’s actually in jail for what would be in the States, a parole violation.Otern wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 12:53 am Did Tommy Robinson break the law? He did film one of the defendants leaving a car and entering the court house. And he did verbally confront him of the crimes he's accused of. If that's illegal and contempt of court, sure, he broke the law. But that's not what he was arrested for, and it's not this incident that got him convicted for contempt of the court.
He was on a suspended sentence for contempt of the court one year ago. This is more clear cut. He brought a camera inside a court house, and filmed illegally. And it's this sentence being enforced when he was arrested now.
But, he was not arrested for contempt of court a few days ago. He was being jailed for contempt of court that happened last year, but he was arrested for disorderly conduct a few days ago. Not sentenced for disorderly conduct. And this is what's problematic. Because it's enough to simply be arrested, not necessarily guilty, to change the suspended sentence to actual prison time.
It should matter if he actually were guilty of disorderly conduct or not, but according to the law, it doesn't matter when you're on a suspended sentence. If anything, this shows a weakness in the British justice system.
Well, was what he did breaking the law though? He filmed himself, talking about the trial. Then got arrested, but not sentenced, for breach of the peace. So, there's the question if he did in fact breach the peace. And he definitely weren't found guilty of breaching the peace.Montegriffo wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 9:47 am More than a parole violation. A suspended sentence is a prison term suspended for a given time which can be applied in full if you break the law during that period. Basically he was let off a prison sentence on the provision that he stayed law abiding.
Parole is conditions such as a curfew which have been imposed as provisions for an early release.
Parole is easier to break as it may include things which are not against the law.
If he is charged with a crime while under a suspended sentence he will receive a full trial at a later date but will have to wait for it in a prison cell.Otern wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 9:58 amWell, was what he did breaking the law though? He filmed himself, talking about the trial. Then got arrested, but not sentenced, for breach of the peace. So, there's the question if he did in fact breach the peace. And he definitely weren't found guilty of breaching the peace.Montegriffo wrote: Wed May 30, 2018 9:47 am More than a parole violation. A suspended sentence is a prison term suspended for a given time which can be applied in full if you break the law during that period. Basically he was let off a prison sentence on the provision that he stayed law abiding.
Parole is conditions such as a curfew which have been imposed as provisions for an early release.
Parole is easier to break as it may include things which are not against the law.