You are responsible for it precisely because you don't give a shit about it and it does not factor into your decisions. I ask this again and again with no response from the likes of you: how many Hillary voters in 2016 do you suppose would still vote for her if it was going to be their candy asses loaded onto a C-5 and shipped off to fight her many wars for her? I contend only a small fraction would still vote for her in that case, most of them females because they know they can just get themselves knocked up to escape the draft.SuburbanFarmer wrote: Tue Jul 03, 2018 8:20 amJust point me to the candidate that’s going to end our pointless invasions.Speaker to Animals wrote: Tue Jul 03, 2018 8:15 am* That the civilians made happen via their votes.
I am sick to death of hearing that voters are responsible for things they never voted on.
Think of it like this.. in the evolution of species, a genetic trait that makes no distinction with respect to survivability -- and thus increased chances of reproduction -- will neither be selected for or against. The environmental pressures that drive evolutionary processes couldn't care less. These traits can linger on for untold time. Most of us still have an appendix. There are little blind moles that still have eye bumps even though the eyes do not work.
The political process in any form of democracy works much like an evolutionary process. The environmental variables that give rise to specific traits in leaders are ALL sourced in the electorate. Because none of you really give a shit about wars, really no politician gives a shit either. They will happily send the 1% of Americans who serve to go fight in Iraq, and you will happily vote for them because they promise you things you do care about.
You are all responsible for this shit.
edit:
This was the secret of men like Hitler. When he said Ich bin Deutschland, Deutschland ist mich, this is what he meant. He sought to become the embodiment of the will of the people. It was some kind of weird union between the people and the leader, where the leader becomes the manifestation of the collective will.