StCapps wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 12:51 pm
BjornP wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 12:47 pm
StCapps wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 12:09 pm
Calling a politician a liar, is about as effective, as calling a politician, a politician.
Whoop Dee Doo Basil.
Right.
So that old "Pocahontas" thing, when Warren pretended to be NA to get a spot in whatever college it was, hasn't hurt her candidacy and credibility?
Dismissing the whole impeachment proceedings against Trump as a fabrication, a lie based in nothing more than political hysteria or whatever... hasn't been effective when used against the Democrats?
It's not the lying that hurts her, it's what the lie says about her that hurts her. Liar is ineffective, Pocahontas is. That's why Trump focuses on the nickname and not just calling her a liar.
From a Trump tweet about Warren (dunno how to copy the twitter link), October 16, 2018:
Now that her claims of being of Indian heritage have turned out to be a scam and a lie, Elizabeth Warren should apologize for perpetrating this fraud against the American Public. Harvard called her “a person of color” (amazing con), and would not have taken her otherwise!
Trump has had no qualms about calling Warren or anyone else out as a liar, not finding a need for nicknames. Some will get nicknames, but he's not doing that based on some strategy of not saying the word "liar".
In any case, whether they say the word "liar" or just indicate that they are, the end result is the same. Potential loss of (public) credibility. Whether it comes from a president, or a critical mass of common citizens.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.