[s]YouTube stuff[/s] cancelled
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: YouTube stuff
:facepalm:
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
As if you know or care what free speech is? English Flaggot shouldn't be lecturing anyone on what free speech is. He is a censorious kiddie diddler.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:41 pmDoes their oath require them to support the constitution and uphold the law?The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:29 pmThe fascists are the ones that have forgotten their oath.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:20 pm
No, appalled.
Not only was this veteran opposed to free speech he also said he would shoot all the protesters if he had a gun. What a fascist.
The right to protest without being threatened with being shot, that sort of thing?
If those are difficult questions maybe you could just explain your motivation for posting this clip of a free speech hating man threatening to shoot protesters?
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
Don't be coy, tell us what you did mean to say.DBTrek wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:03 pmMontegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:23 pm
Are you suggesting that people exercising their right to protest are domestic enemies of the constitution?
Surely not.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
Funny you should mention that. What exactly do you suppose our oath demands if the democrats and neocons manage to overthrow the democratically-elected government of the United States in a sham impeachment and Senate trial?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:44 pmI, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
The Constitution requires proof of "high crimes and misdeamenors" and yet, after several years of legal fishing expeditions, they cannot even name a single statute Trump violated.
One side is actively trying to overthrow the Constitution here, and they are not Trump supporters..
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
We were talking about a veteran saying that he would shoot protesters if he had a gun.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:38 amFunny you should mention that. What exactly do you suppose our oath demands if the democrats and neocons manage to overthrow the democratically-elected government of the United States in a sham impeachment and Senate trial?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:44 pmI, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
The Constitution requires proof of "high crimes and misdeamenors" and yet, after several years of legal fishing expeditions, they cannot even name a single statute Trump violated.
One side is actively trying to overthrow the Constitution here, and they are not Trump supporters..
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
Consider the possibility that he recognizes this group of people are lemmings who prop up deep state traitors who, even today, continue their attempt to overthrow the constitutional government of the United States.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 amWe were talking about a veteran saying that he would shoot protesters if he had a gun.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:38 amFunny you should mention that. What exactly do you suppose our oath demands if the democrats and neocons manage to overthrow the democratically-elected government of the United States in a sham impeachment and Senate trial?
The Constitution requires proof of "high crimes and misdeamenors" and yet, after several years of legal fishing expeditions, they cannot even name a single statute Trump violated.
One side is actively trying to overthrow the Constitution here, and they are not Trump supporters..
I swore a blood oath to God to defend that dumbass document. It's stupid, but I am not going to break my oath.
The democrats right now represent a huge threat to the Constitution. They have people calling for illegitimate laws that send police into house-to-house urban warfare to.confiscate sporting rifles. They do not like the outcome of the 2016 election, so they are trying to overthrow American democracy because they do not like Trump.
Every month they inch a little closer to that fateful day.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
I'm not really interested in talking about your civil war fantasies. Sorry, try someone else.
From what I could see on the short clip this was a perfectly legal, peaceful demonstration and the veteran in question was angry about them exercising their first amendment rights and threatening that he would shoot them all if he had a gun.
From what I could see on the short clip this was a perfectly legal, peaceful demonstration and the veteran in question was angry about them exercising their first amendment rights and threatening that he would shoot them all if he had a gun.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
Well, keep on acting mystified as to why veterans are telling the left to BTFO from this anti-Constitutional bullshit, I guess.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:27 amI'm not really interested in talking about your civil war fantasies. Sorry, try someone else.
From what I could see on the short clip this was a perfectly legal, peaceful demonstration and the veteran in question was angry about them exercising their first amendment rights and threatening that he would shoot them all if he had a gun.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
Are you arguing that the first amendment is unconstitutional?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 6:42 amAre you arguing that the first amendment is unconstitutional?
DBTrek wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:03 pmMontegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:23 pm
Are you suggesting that people exercising their right to protest are domestic enemies of the constitution?
Surely not.