[s]YouTube stuff[/s] cancelled

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Tue Nov 12, 2019 11:04 pm

:facepalm:
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by clubgop » Wed Nov 13, 2019 12:44 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:41 pm
The Conservative wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:29 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:20 pm


No, appalled.
Not only was this veteran opposed to free speech he also said he would shoot all the protesters if he had a gun. What a fascist.
The fascists are the ones that have forgotten their oath.
Does their oath require them to support the constitution and uphold the law?
The right to protest without being threatened with being shot, that sort of thing?

If those are difficult questions maybe you could just explain your motivation for posting this clip of a free speech hating man threatening to shoot protesters?
As if you know or care what free speech is? English Flaggot shouldn't be lecturing anyone on what free speech is. He is a censorious kiddie diddler.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:47 am

DBTrek wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:03 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:23 pm

Are you suggesting that people exercising their right to protest are domestic enemies of the constitution?
Surely not.
Image
Don't be coy, tell us what you did mean to say.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:38 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:44 pm
I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
Funny you should mention that. What exactly do you suppose our oath demands if the democrats and neocons manage to overthrow the democratically-elected government of the United States in a sham impeachment and Senate trial?

The Constitution requires proof of "high crimes and misdeamenors" and yet, after several years of legal fishing expeditions, they cannot even name a single statute Trump violated.

One side is actively trying to overthrow the Constitution here, and they are not Trump supporters..

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:38 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:44 pm
I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
Funny you should mention that. What exactly do you suppose our oath demands if the democrats and neocons manage to overthrow the democratically-elected government of the United States in a sham impeachment and Senate trial?

The Constitution requires proof of "high crimes and misdeamenors" and yet, after several years of legal fishing expeditions, they cannot even name a single statute Trump violated.

One side is actively trying to overthrow the Constitution here, and they are not Trump supporters..
We were talking about a veteran saying that he would shoot protesters if he had a gun.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:16 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:10 am
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:38 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:44 pm
Funny you should mention that. What exactly do you suppose our oath demands if the democrats and neocons manage to overthrow the democratically-elected government of the United States in a sham impeachment and Senate trial?

The Constitution requires proof of "high crimes and misdeamenors" and yet, after several years of legal fishing expeditions, they cannot even name a single statute Trump violated.

One side is actively trying to overthrow the Constitution here, and they are not Trump supporters..
We were talking about a veteran saying that he would shoot protesters if he had a gun.
Consider the possibility that he recognizes this group of people are lemmings who prop up deep state traitors who, even today, continue their attempt to overthrow the constitutional government of the United States.

I swore a blood oath to God to defend that dumbass document. It's stupid, but I am not going to break my oath.

The democrats right now represent a huge threat to the Constitution. They have people calling for illegitimate laws that send police into house-to-house urban warfare to.confiscate sporting rifles. They do not like the outcome of the 2016 election, so they are trying to overthrow American democracy because they do not like Trump.

Every month they inch a little closer to that fateful day.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:27 am

I'm not really interested in talking about your civil war fantasies. Sorry, try someone else.
From what I could see on the short clip this was a perfectly legal, peaceful demonstration and the veteran in question was angry about them exercising their first amendment rights and threatening that he would shoot them all if he had a gun.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:49 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:27 am
I'm not really interested in talking about your civil war fantasies. Sorry, try someone else.
From what I could see on the short clip this was a perfectly legal, peaceful demonstration and the veteran in question was angry about them exercising their first amendment rights and threatening that he would shoot them all if he had a gun.
Well, keep on acting mystified as to why veterans are telling the left to BTFO from this anti-Constitutional bullshit, I guess.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 13, 2019 6:42 am

Are you arguing that the first amendment is unconstitutional?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Nov 13, 2019 6:56 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 13, 2019 6:42 am
Are you arguing that the first amendment is unconstitutional?
DBTrek wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:03 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:23 pm

Are you suggesting that people exercising their right to protest are domestic enemies of the constitution?
Surely not.
Image