The fascists are the ones that have forgotten their oath.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:20 pmNo, appalled.The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 4:48 pmTriggered?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 4:13 pm
Yes mate, you fought for their right to protest. Now you would shoot protesters if you had a gun. Are you sure you fought on the right side?
Not only was this veteran opposed to free speech he also said he would shoot all the protesters if he had a gun. What a fascist.
[s]YouTube stuff[/s] cancelled
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: YouTube stuff
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
Does their oath require them to support the constitution and uphold the law?The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:29 pmThe fascists are the ones that have forgotten their oath.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:20 pmNo, appalled.
Not only was this veteran opposed to free speech he also said he would shoot all the protesters if he had a gun. What a fascist.
The right to protest without being threatened with being shot, that sort of thing?
If those are difficult questions maybe you could just explain your motivation for posting this clip of a free speech hating man threatening to shoot protesters?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:44 pmI, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: YouTube stuff
You forgot the other part...DBTrek wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:01 pmMontegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:44 pmI, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
Are you suggesting that people exercising their right to protest are domestic enemies of the constitution?DBTrek wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:01 pmMontegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:44 pmI, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.
Surely not.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: YouTube stuff
You are out of your depth here.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:23 pmAre you suggesting that people exercising their right to protest are domestic enemies of the constitution?
Surely not.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
How?The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:36 pmYou are out of your depth here.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:23 pmAre you suggesting that people exercising their right to protest are domestic enemies of the constitution?
Surely not.
Do you think that anyone protesting against the President should be shot?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: YouTube stuff
Soldiers are not civilians.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:47 pmHow?The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:36 pmYou are out of your depth here.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:23 pm
Are you suggesting that people exercising their right to protest are domestic enemies of the constitution?
Surely not.
Do you think that anyone protesting against the President should be shot?
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:23 pm
Are you suggesting that people exercising their right to protest are domestic enemies of the constitution?
Surely not.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"