2020 General Election Predictions

[Martin Hash]

UBI & Emotional Support animals, guys. Time to begin strategizing forward. Lying about everything is also an easy one to get started with.

Perversity will prevail.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

in order for these results to be accurate

you have simultaneously believe that

Biden is the most popular candidate who ever ran for president

and

Trump is the most unpopular incumbent who ever ran for president, despite drastically expanding his base and getting historical republican turnout

neither of which is even close to true

and this impossible combo fueled the statistically impossible turnout in democrat strongholds and swing counties in swing states, that was one sided and inexplicable

the numbers do not add up

historical republican turnout - totally believable

historic democratic turn out - statistically impossible*

*10^-50

whatever, troll who clearly cannot read basic english

My English skills aren't the point. Your math skills are.

[StCapps]

historical republican turnout - totally believable

historic democratic turn out - statistically impossible*

*10^-50

whatever, troll who clearly cannot read basic english

My English skills aren't the point. Your math skills are.

you can't do math either

you think historic democrat turnout, at levels Obama would have killed for, for a terrible candidate instead, is a likely outcome

TDS is a helluva drug

[PartyOf5]

People saying the vote totals are up because mail-in voting is so much easier than in-person are lying.

No one believes that the same people who can't be bothered to vote in-person are going to bother to request a ballot themselves. Those that say "they can request online, it's easy" are the same ones saying how it's too difficult for these people to get an ID.

All lies.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

whatever, troll who clearly cannot read basic english

My English skills aren't the point. Your math skills are.

you can't do math either

you think historic democrat turnout, at levels Obama would have killed for, for a terrible candidate instead, is a likely outcome

TDS is a helluva drug

Now who English bad, bruh?

I've never suggested 'likely,' only 'not statistically impossible.'

[PartyOf5]

whatever, troll who clearly cannot read basic english

My English skills aren't the point. Your math skills are.

you can't do math either

you think historic democrat turnout, at levels Obama would have killed for, for a terrible candidate instead, is a likely outcome

TDS is a helluva drug

You are trying to argue math with someone who believes 2+2=5. His support animal understands math better than he does.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

My English skills aren't the point. Your math skills are.

you can't do math either

you think historic democrat turnout, at levels Obama would have killed for, for a terrible candidate instead, is a likely outcome

TDS is a helluva drug

You are trying to argue math with someone who believes 2+2=5. His support animal understands math better than he does.

Don't be silly. My support animal detects seizures early - theoretically. Never been tested, though.

[StCapps]

yeah I'm done with HM

constant gainsaying with no actual point

and zero insight

total waste of time

[Zlaxer]

Everybody always knew what the mail-in ballots were all about. It was predicted to go to SCOTUS and it will. SCOTUS will decide. That's how modern democracy works.

They will decide there is not enough evidence to throw out the tens of thousands of ballots needed to give Trump the win. Everyone will know the truth, but we will be left to live with the lie.

Depends how well Trump's lawyers & investigators do.

You believe lawyering still determines SCOTUS holdings...cute.

*Investigators matter here.

[Martin Hash]

We need an evolving strategy, one that adopts some of the winning tactics of our competitors: deplatforming comes immediately to mind.