I think we should get the department of energy to ratchet back up Nuke production then. We need to have enough to take out the whole planet 3 times over. Let niggas know that we are all in this together. We go down, and we take all of you with us and then some. That's how you send a message when you are running the US govt.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:49 pmThere are not enough nukes to do that and, even if so, the calculus of nuclear war dictates that you go 100% against your opponent in an attempt to cripple his ability to launch against you and to mobilize for conventional war afterward.heydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:48 pmNot if we take everybody else out. Not that I'd want to live after a major nuclear exchange anyway. I'd be all deformed, missing my teeth and radiation sick as a mangy dog. Or I'd not die from the radiation and starve to death. I'd rather just get fried instantly.
Socialism
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Socialism
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Socialism
heydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:50 pmI think we should get the department of energy to ratchet back up Nuke production then. We need to have enough to take out the whole planet 3 times over. Let niggas know that we are all in this together. We go down, and we take all of you with us and then some. That's how you send a message when you are running the US govt.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:49 pmThere are not enough nukes to do that and, even if so, the calculus of nuclear war dictates that you go 100% against your opponent in an attempt to cripple his ability to launch against you and to mobilize for conventional war afterward.heydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:48 pm
Not if we take everybody else out. Not that I'd want to live after a major nuclear exchange anyway. I'd be all deformed, missing my teeth and radiation sick as a mangy dog. Or I'd not die from the radiation and starve to death. I'd rather just get fried instantly.
Nukes are overrated, honestly.
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Socialism
Tell that to Hwen. His grandparents got the nagasaki blue plate special...Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:51 pmheydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:50 pmI think we should get the department of energy to ratchet back up Nuke production then. We need to have enough to take out the whole planet 3 times over. Let niggas know that we are all in this together. We go down, and we take all of you with us and then some. That's how you send a message when you are running the US govt.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:49 pm
There are not enough nukes to do that and, even if so, the calculus of nuclear war dictates that you go 100% against your opponent in an attempt to cripple his ability to launch against you and to mobilize for conventional war afterward.
Nukes are overrated, honestly.
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Socialism
LeMay's firebombing campaigns were a fuck ton more destructive than those atomic bombs. Where the atomic bombs shined was in their efficiency. We proved we could just leisurely exterminate the Japanese if they did not surrender, at much lower economic costs.heydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:51 pmTell that to Hwen. His grandparents got the nagasaki blue plate special...Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:51 pmheydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:50 pm
I think we should get the department of energy to ratchet back up Nuke production then. We need to have enough to take out the whole planet 3 times over. Let niggas know that we are all in this together. We go down, and we take all of you with us and then some. That's how you send a message when you are running the US govt.
Nukes are overrated, honestly.
America's military might has always been economic. Either out-producing the enemy or making warfare efficient as we did there. The USAF always talks in industrial terms too. We talk about sortie production and use industrial metrics. It's just a factory of death.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Socialism
Even in the Cold War stalemate, our secret to success was that we could easily defeat the Soviets economically. We literally bankrupted them by forcing them to constantly compete with warhead production to keep up with the arms race. I don't for a moment believe the Reaganites actually believed it would work, but it did.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Socialism
It's not so much about mass for America.heydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:50 pmI think we should get the department of energy to ratchet back up Nuke production then. We need to have enough to take out the whole planet 3 times over. Let niggas know that we are all in this together. We go down, and we take all of you with us and then some. That's how you send a message when you are running the US govt.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:49 pmThere are not enough nukes to do that and, even if so, the calculus of nuclear war dictates that you go 100% against your opponent in an attempt to cripple his ability to launch against you and to mobilize for conventional war afterward.heydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:48 pm
Not if we take everybody else out. Not that I'd want to live after a major nuclear exchange anyway. I'd be all deformed, missing my teeth and radiation sick as a mangy dog. Or I'd not die from the radiation and starve to death. I'd rather just get fried instantly.
America can leverage situational awareness, stealth, precision, and strategic defense enablers.
It's not so much about more, but better. Better, smarter, faster, stealthier.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Socialism
I wonder if we could do that with China. Just ramp up production, get them to as well, and bankrupt their chinky asses, or at least force them to take away from the budget in other things. They might not take the bait. Idk man.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:55 pmLeMay's firebombing campaigns were a fuck ton more destructive than those atomic bombs. Where the atomic bombs shined was in their efficiency. We proved we could just leisurely exterminate the Japanese if they did not surrender, at much lower economic costs.heydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:51 pmTell that to Hwen. His grandparents got the nagasaki blue plate special...
America's military might has always been economic. Either out-producing the enemy or making warfare efficient as we did there. The USAF always talks in industrial terms too. We talk about sortie production and use industrial metrics. It's just a factory of death.
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Socialism
You talked about this some to me the other day. If you were dictator, and given a blank check for the military and defense budget, how would you go about investing in R&D and existing weapons to make this Supercounterforce viable? What would your strategy be?Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:50 pmThus why I say you should be building a Supercounterforce next generation post-MAD deterrent.heydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:48 pmNot if we take everybody else out. Not that I'd want to live after a major nuclear exchange anyway. I'd be all deformed, missing my teeth and radiation sick as a mangy dog. Or I'd not die from the radiation and starve to death. I'd rather just get fried instantly.
It's both a better deterrent, and should deterrence fail, the Supercounterforce ensures that America wins with comparatively light casualties.
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Socialism
Just as Speaker says, go big, King Dollah spends them into submission, with Supercounterforce as backup for when they are in their death throes, just in case they do something crazy on the way out.heydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 1:04 pmYou talked about this some to me the other day. If you were dictator, and given a blank check for the military and defense budget, how would you go about investing in R&D and existing weapons to make this Supercounterforce viable? What would your strategy be?Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:50 pmThus why I say you should be building a Supercounterforce next generation post-MAD deterrent.heydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:48 pm
Not if we take everybody else out. Not that I'd want to live after a major nuclear exchange anyway. I'd be all deformed, missing my teeth and radiation sick as a mangy dog. Or I'd not die from the radiation and starve to death. I'd rather just get fried instantly.
It's both a better deterrent, and should deterrence fail, the Supercounterforce ensures that America wins with comparatively light casualties.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: Socialism
You are truly tiresome. No actual fact based argument, so you are reduced to name calling and making weird shit up. Some things actually matter.heydaralon wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 12:03 pmMore than a city person will grow, we can all be sure of that you faggot. You are more religious than any person I've ever met. You accused fife of being a suicide bomber, but you could give Mohamed Atta a run for his money in your zealotry and extra-ordinary claims you take on faith.brewster wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 11:42 amSo show the numbers that growing your food but driving everywhere you need to go produces less carbon. Otherwise you're just blowing smoke. And that's putting aside the fact that its a very rare suburban and rural person who actually produces anywhere near a majority of their own food.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 10:43 amEverything you consume, every single day, has to be shipped to you. Just because you can ride your bike to the corner store to buy groceries does not relieve you of these costs.
If you keep hanging out with these lowlifes at the soup kitchen, eventually you will be convicted as an accesory after the fact for welfare fraud. You will go to prison. Do you know what happens to climate change activists in prison? They are viewed by both the inmates and guards with utter contempt. Often the inmates will "green house gas" these activist prisoners. That's where 4 black guys hold you down and pry your mouth open and then take turns farting into your throat and nose, pumping you full of methane. I saw that on Nat Geo's Locked Up show, and that is what will happen to you if you keep sanctimoniously complaining about the atmosphere and helping lowlifes steal from the taxpayer with your wife. I'm trying to help you get off this path, and you have repeatedly spit in my face.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND