Smitty-48 wrote: Thu May 13, 2021 4:47 pm
not only did I never meet a female soldier I couldn't have killed easily with my bare hands, nolo contendere
converse to that, I didn't encounter one male soldier I could have killed easily
every single female soldier was totally helpless in the face of me
every single male had a fighting chance
Sounds like your military will do great in the bare-hand wars.
But ... not too great against my lady snipers.
The problem is you seem to see how technology has effected the labor force, but you believe your armed forces are magically immune from the same. They're not.
StCapps wrote: Thu May 13, 2021 4:55 pm
the message was you are engaging in fallacies as your core argument
the noteworthy and feared militaries aren't noteworthy or feared because of having chicks in the front lines
I didn't claim they were. I offered the empyrical observation that none of the major militaries on earth are male-only. And the few male-only militaries on earth are regularly rolled by everyone around them. An observation isn't a statement of direct correlation. If I say "it's hot outside, and the stock market is up" I'm not correlating the two.
But I'm not here to make you smarter.
You're supposed to do your own work on that front.
My observation stands.
Your complainy-pants pedantry falls.
