seems like quite the leap just because they had problems with one of them
zerohedge SIFCLFs gonna SIFCLF tho
I mean, given a 100% failure rate in our test launches over the past decade, and being 5x beyond expected service life, I’d say the possibility is there.
seems like quite the leap just because they had problems with one of them
zerohedge SIFCLFs gonna SIFCLF tho
I mean, given a 100% failure rate in our test launches over the past decade, and being 5x beyond expected service life, I’d say the possibility is there.
you say that when there any bugs with any military equipment
new or old, everything is "obsolete" to you, if there is any flaw at all
zerohedge runs it's libertarian foreign policy/fiscal conservative/pacifist propaganda attacking all military spending under the sun and you heavily buy into it every single time
why you would trust zerohedge for military analysis, given that clear bias is beyond me
confirmation bias is a helluva drug
Last edited by StCapps on Thu May 06, 2021 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
StCapps wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 9:11 pm
seems like quite the leap just because they had problems with one of them
zerohedge SIFCLFs gonna SIFCLF tho
I mean, given a 100% failure rate in our test launches over the past decade, and being 5x beyond expected service life, I’d say the possibility is there.
you say that when there any bugs with any military equipment
new or old, everything is "obsolete" to you, if there is any flaw at all
zerohedge runs it's pacifist propaganda attacking everything under the sun and you heavily buy into it every single time
why you would trust zerohedge for military analysis, given that clear bias is beyond me
confirmation bias is a helluva drug
Well thanks for your input I guess. I’ll look forward to what other posters think.
I mean, given a 100% failure rate in our test launches over the past decade, and being 5x beyond expected service life, I’d say the possibility is there.
you say that when there any bugs with any military equipment
new or old, everything is "obsolete" to you, if there is any flaw at all
zerohedge runs it's pacifist propaganda attacking everything under the sun and you heavily buy into it every single time
why you would trust zerohedge for military analysis, given that clear bias is beyond me
confirmation bias is a helluva drug
Well thanks for your input I guess. I’ll look forward to what other posters think.
put down the zerohedge bro, it's rotting your brain
one dimensional SIFCLF pandering is obvious
check a source whose bias differs from your own from time to time, instead of only looking to zerohedge and the sources they cite or agree with
all you do is repeat their talking points, typical zerohedge farmer
StCapps wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 9:30 pm
you say that when there any bugs with any military equipment
new or old, everything is "obsolete" to you, if there is any flaw at all
zerohedge runs it's pacifist propaganda attacking everything under the sun and you heavily buy into it every single time
why you would trust zerohedge for military analysis, given that clear bias is beyond me
confirmation bias is a helluva drug
Well thanks for your input I guess. I’ll look forward to what other posters think.
put down the zerohedge bro, it's rotting your brain
one dimensional SIFCLF pandering is obvious
check a source whose bias differs from your own from time to time, instead of only looking to zerohedge and the sources they cite or agree with
all you do is repeat their talking points, typical zerohedge farmer
I’ll ask once again - do you have a better news aggregator for me to try?
I disagree with plenty of their stuff. I just thought it was interesting that we failed to launch a doomsday weapon that’s supposed to fire within 20 minutes.
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 10:04 pmI disagree with plenty of their stuff.
I literally cannot recall even a single time that you have done so
next time you disagree with them, show the receipts, because they seem to be your only source for military and economic related news and you always seem to concur with their talking points
I just thought it was interesting that we failed to launch a doomsday weapon that’s supposed to fire within 20 minutes.
you just thought that one failed test implied all the land based missiles might not work, that's some fierce backpedaling in the face of scrutiny
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 10:04 pmI disagree with plenty of their stuff.
I literally cannot recall even a single time that you have done so
next time you disagree with them, show the receipts, because they seem to be your only source for military and economic related news and you always seem to concur with their talking points
I don’t repost the things I disagree with. That’s a pretty big chunk of content.
Since you still haven’t provided an alternative, I guess I’ll go ahead and continue to use the site.
