WWII Equipment - Vics, Aircraft and Kit

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: WWII Equipment - Vics, Aircraft and Kit

Post by C-Mag »

Hastur wrote:I want a Daimler Dingo Scout Car.

Image
8-)


Scout Cars in general are really cool, they vary so much and their role can vary so much.

Here's one set up for direct support operations
Image

I'm reminded of when I was a Bradley gunner, we would get attached to different types of Battalions for support. Our standard role was with an Armored Task Force. Hang 200 to 400 meters behind the Main Battle Tanks. But, you get attached to a light infantry unit, and suddenly you are the biggest gun in the Battalion and you are going directly to the front of the line and the LTC is loving having you as extra muscle.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: WWII Equipment - Vics, Aircraft and Kit

Post by Okeefenokee »

Hastur wrote:I want a Daimler Dingo Scout Car.

Image
Diamler Dingo. I lolled.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: WWII Equipment - Vics, Aircraft and Kit

Post by Okeefenokee »

C-Mag wrote:I'm reminded of when I was a Bradley gunner, we would get attached to different types of Battalions for support. Our standard role was with an Armored Task Force. Hang 200 to 400 meters behind the Main Battle Tanks. But, you get attached to a light infantry unit, and suddenly you are the biggest gun in the Battalion and you are going directly to the front of the line and the LTC is loving having you as extra muscle.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: WWII Equipment - Vics, Aircraft and Kit

Post by C-Mag »

Okeefenokee wrote:
C-Mag wrote:I'm reminded of when I was a Bradley gunner, we would get attached to different types of Battalions for support. Our standard role was with an Armored Task Force. Hang 200 to 400 meters behind the Main Battle Tanks. But, you get attached to a light infantry unit, and suddenly you are the biggest gun in the Battalion and you are going directly to the front of the line and the LTC is loving having you as extra muscle.
Cool, the CG guys don't have the cyclic rate fastest enough on the M242 Bushmaster.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
de officiis
Posts: 2528
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:09 am

Re: WWII Equipment - Vics, Aircraft and Kit

Post by de officiis »

Image
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: WWII Equipment - Vics, Aircraft and Kit

Post by Montegriffo »

I've always been fascinated by the story and the vehicles of the LRDG.

Image

Image

Image

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
de officiis
Posts: 2528
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:09 am

Re: WWII Equipment - Vics, Aircraft and Kit

Post by de officiis »

I read somewhere that they had to work like crazy to keep those things running in all that dust and sand.
Image
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: WWII Equipment - Vics, Aircraft and Kit

Post by Montegriffo »

Heavy duty air filters and regular cleaning of things like the radiators would have been essential. They did travel huge distances though so must have been fairly robust.
The heat must have been unbearable in the Summer. I've been deep into the Sahara in the middle of winter and it was still 35 degrees C.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: WWII Equipment - Vics, Aircraft and Kit

Post by Speaker to Animals »

On a tarmac in the middle of the Arabian desert, it gets over 130F between ambient and the heat radiating off the concrete.

However, aircraft maintain better in the dry heat than they do in the wet cold, by a pretty wide margin. Maybe it's the same with vehicles?
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: WWII Equipment - Vics, Aircraft and Kit

Post by Montegriffo »

I think the LRDG travelled mostly at night to avoid being spotted by aircraft and enemy patrols so the heat wouldn't have been such a factor for the vehicles. I was thinking of the men hiding up in the day time trying to sleep in the heat.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image