I'm still not really getting this Reductive Escalation to counterforce idea...Smitty-48 wrote: Thu Mar 18, 2021 3:38 pm both sides immediately abandoned MAD and started Reductive Escalation to counterforce
How does that work?
I'm still not really getting this Reductive Escalation to counterforce idea...Smitty-48 wrote: Thu Mar 18, 2021 3:38 pm both sides immediately abandoned MAD and started Reductive Escalation to counterforce
Doesn’t seem to make sense on the face of it, other than perhaps both sides accepting that MAD isn’t viable. So to remain threatening, they make the use of nukes more likely.
Not viable...SuburbanFarmer wrote: Thu Mar 18, 2021 5:26 pm Doesn’t seem to make sense on the face of it, other than perhaps both sides accepting that MAD isn’t viable. So to remain threatening, they make the use of nukes more likely.
the escalation is towards the use of nuclear weapons
NATO is an American deterrence umbrellaSuburbanFarmer wrote: Thu Mar 18, 2021 6:41 pm Makes ya wonder why Europe is still playing along with NATO.