How much Voter Fraud do you think we will see this year?

[Martin Hash]

I’ll admit that the billygoats R probably smarter than me but what about those 30 judges? Let’s see, me vs. 30 judges:

What R the odds 1 of those judges is a licensed, bonded & insured accountant that can testify in court? 1 in 1,000,000? How about 1 of those judges is a licensed, bonded & insured data scientist that can testify in court? How about 1 in 10,000,000? Elected judges don’t have to be lawyers, so that’s a wash, which means the chances of those 30 judges being better arbitrators than me on the issue of election fraud is 10^13 against, give or take an order of magnitude; about the same odds of there not being fraud. Mutterfukkers R going to need a lot more judges!

How exactly does one get ‘licensed and bonded’ as a data scientist? This sounds profitable.

My PE license is in Computer Science; maybe there’s a 100 of us?

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Not irritating at all. It’s nice to have a dissenting voice around here. I’ve complained about the circle-jerk many times when I played the role.

I mostly agree with consensus on this particular issue though - the fraud cannot be ignored by any sensible person.

Appreciated.

But, even if it isn't all that irritating yet, I don't have much else to contribute. I expect that, as accurate and brilliant as they are, the arguments I've made will lose some luster with too much repetition.

Well, you’ll have to bring the beef my dude. Simply stating that it’s not fraud because the state officials say so isn’t going to fly.

You do have some valid points on the SCOTUS case, but I don’t think any of us - including the esteemed Mr Hash - are fluent enough in legaleese to issue a definitive ruling.

You are tempting me to break my word and make more arguments.

It won't work. GET BEHIND ME SATAN!

[TheOneX]

Look, I'll quit posting about this because these dispatches from normie corner are not convincing to you fellas, and my goal isn't to irritate everybody.

Not irritating at all. It’s nice to have a dissenting voice around here. I’ve complained about the circle-jerk many times when I played the role.

I mostly agree with consensus on this particular issue though - the fraud cannot be ignored by any sensible person.

Appreciated.

But, even if it isn't all that irritating yet, I don't have much else to contribute. I expect that, as accurate and brilliant as they are, the arguments I've made will lose some luster with too much repetition.

There is a distinct lack of variety in the conversations that can make it hard to contribute something new.

[The Conservative]

Appreciated.

But, even if it isn't all that irritating yet, I don't have much else to contribute. I expect that, as accurate and brilliant as they are, the arguments I've made will lose some luster with too much repetition.

Well, you’ll have to bring the beef my dude. Simply stating that it’s not fraud because the state officials say so isn’t going to fly.

You do have some valid points on the SCOTUS case, but I don’t think any of us - including the esteemed Mr Hash - are fluent enough in legaleese to issue a definitive ruling.

You are tempting me to break my word and make more arguments.

It won't work. GET BEHIND ME SATAN!

You opened the can of worms by not providing enough evidence.

[SilverEagle]

Well, you’ll have to bring the beef my dude. Simply stating that it’s not fraud because the state officials say so isn’t going to fly.

You do have some valid points on the SCOTUS case, but I don’t think any of us - including the esteemed Mr Hash - are fluent enough in legaleese to issue a definitive ruling.

You are tempting me to break my word and make more arguments.

It won't work. GET BEHIND ME SATAN!

You opened the can of worms by not providing enough evidence.

Exactly!

[Xenophon]

[Xenophon]

Michigan Forensics report on the Dominion Voting machines just dropped:

https://depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/ ... acted].pdf

4. The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that
the election night error (detailed above by the vote "flip" from Trump to Biden,
was the result of human error caused by the failure to update the Mancelona
Township tabulator prior to election night for a down ballot race. We disagree and
conclude that the vote flip occurred because of machine error built into the voting
software designed to create error.

The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission
guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of
68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election
integrity

The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County
from December 6, 2020consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or
68.05% of the events were recorded errors. These errors resulted in overall
tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves
the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal
election laws

In Central Lake Township there were 1,222 ballots reversed out of 1,491 total
ballots cast, resulting in an 81.96% rejection rate. All reversed ballots are sent to
adjudication for a decision by election personnel.

Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years;
but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The
adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack
of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous
absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the
same software. Removal of these files violates state law and prevents a
meaningful audit, even if the Secretary wanted to conduct an audit. We must
conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.

Likewise, all server security logs prior to 11:03 pm on November 4, 2020 are
missing. This means that all security logs for the day after the election, on
election day, and prior to election day are gone. Security logs are very important
to an audit trail, forensics, and for detecting advanced persistent threats and
outside attacks, especially on systems with outdated system files. These logs
would contain domain controls, authentication failures, error codes, times users
logged on and off, network connections to file servers between file accesses,
internet connections, times, and data transfers. Other server logs before
November 4, 2020 are present; therefore, there is no reasonable explanation for
the security logs to be missing

The Election Event Designer Log shows that Dominion ImageCast Precinct
Cards were programmed with new ballot programming on 10/23/2020 and then
again after the election on 11/05/2020. These system changes affect how ballots
are read and tabulated, and our examination demonstrated a significant change
in voter results using the two different programs. In accordance with the Help
America Vote Act, this violates the 90-day Safe Harbor Period which prohibits
changes to election systems, registries, hardware/software updates without
undergoing re-certification. According to the National Conference of State
Legislatures – Michigan requires full compliance with federal standards as
determined by a federally accredited voting system laboratory.

The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020
and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which
violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion
Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated
movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State
website are false

Lol, no evidence. COPE

[SuburbanFarmer]

‘Certified election results’ is apparently a rubber stamp.

[Martin Hash]

The Mutterfukkers know all this; they are completely disingenuous with their rebuttals, as demonstrated by some members of this forum.

[Xenophon]

Rumors are the Wisconsin Supreme Court sided with the Trump Campaign. Will post link when I find it.

Found it: https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/Dis ... qNo=315283

39 We conclude Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) requires that
(1) each individual elector make his or her own determination as
to whether the elector is indefinitely confined; (2) an elector's
determination may be based only upon age, physical illness or
infirmity; and (3) an elector is indefinitely confined for his or
her own age, physical illness or infirmity, not those of another
person.

40 Accordingly, we conclude that the Respondents'
interpretation of Wisconsin's election laws is erroneous.
Additionally, we conclude that Emergency Order #12 did not render
all Wisconsin electors "indefinitely confined," thereby obviating
the requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an
absentee ballot.
By the Court.—Rights declared.

They now have the right to invalidate those absentee ballots.