That is precisely my point. An open seat animates Trump's voters more than Biden's, who are already animated against Trump regardless of the the SCOTUS vacancy.The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:37 amI'm not sure he will lose. As somoene said before, I can run faster scared than you angry. Which basically means the DNC is angry, the RNC is scared... I think the people of the RNC will consolodate better in fear of what Biden and ultimately Harris/AOC/etc may do...Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:26 amJust to be clear, this is an argument against interest.
I very much want Trump to make a nomination, fill the bench, and then lose the 2020 race.
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
There is no such thing.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:40 amI think it is absolutely critical that the seat is filled, and that a serious, non-partisan jurist will likely find that the post election-night ballots that come in for Biden are valid votes.
I also have no reason to believe Trump will pick an un-serious, partisan jurist, given the two picks he has already had - so, yeah, absolutely, fill the seat.
-
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
That is certainly what the Dems think, which is why they don't want to give Trump another nomination.Xenophon wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:04 amThere is no such thing.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:40 amI think it is absolutely critical that the seat is filled, and that a serious, non-partisan jurist will likely find that the post election-night ballots that come in for Biden are valid votes.
I also have no reason to believe Trump will pick an un-serious, partisan jurist, given the two picks he has already had - so, yeah, absolutely, fill the seat.
I'm not so cynical.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I'm not worried about the animated Biden voters. It's the re-animated ones that worry me. Cemeteries lean heavily Democrat.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:42 amThat is precisely my point. An open seat animates Trump's voters more than Biden's, who are already animated against Trump regardless of the the SCOTUS vacancy.
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Martin needs to figure out a way to get a lock on that dead guy vote.PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:48 amI'm not worried about the animated Biden voters. It's the re-animated ones that worry me. Cemeteries lean heavily Democrat.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:42 amThat is precisely my point. An open seat animates Trump's voters more than Biden's, who are already animated against Trump regardless of the the SCOTUS vacancy.
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
^^^ +1 ^^^
The Dems don't have a lot of ways to stop the GOP. They will try all kinds of shennanigans to slow the process. Tardiness, drag out discussions, whatever they can to try and force this at least past the election.
I personally don't think the GOP should have hearings, that would be a nightmare, and gives the Dems a chance to roll out fake accusers.
The Dems don't have a lot of ways to stop the GOP. They will try all kinds of shennanigans to slow the process. Tardiness, drag out discussions, whatever they can to try and force this at least past the election.
I personally don't think the GOP should have hearings, that would be a nightmare, and gives the Dems a chance to roll out fake accusers.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
C-Mag wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:05 pm^^^ +1 ^^^
The Dems don't have a lot of ways to stop the GOP. They will try all kinds of shennanigans to slow the process. Tardiness, drag out discussions, whatever they can to try and force this at least past the election.
I personally don't think the GOP should have hearings, that would be a nightmare, and gives the Dems a chance to roll out fake accusers.
We need to weaponize SCOTUS and the police to make marxism illegal - I don’t give a fuck about McCarthyism - he was fucking right. This cancer on humanity needs to be irritated. Fuck the Constitution - it’s worthless anyways bc only 1 side even tries to follow it. What good is a 1 sided contract? Nothing. What do we have to loose at this point? The left are not your neighbors, they do not share your values or your beliefs...they hate you and would slit your kids throat in a second if it meant more power (don’t forget they’re already shooting conservative children in the head).
Mao is coming for your children.
The legions of useful idiots are sunk costs at this point...
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Actually, if we do it right, we could stay within the consitution's boundries.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:24 pmC-Mag wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:05 pm^^^ +1 ^^^
The Dems don't have a lot of ways to stop the GOP. They will try all kinds of shennanigans to slow the process. Tardiness, drag out discussions, whatever they can to try and force this at least past the election.
I personally don't think the GOP should have hearings, that would be a nightmare, and gives the Dems a chance to roll out fake accusers.
We need to weaponize SCOTUS and the police to make marxism illegal - I don’t give a fuck about McCarthyism - he was fucking right. This cancer on humanity needs to be irritated. Fuck the Constitution - it’s worthless anyways - what do we have to loose at this point?
Mao is coming for your children.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:37 pmActually, if we do it right, we could stay within the consitution's boundries.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:24 pmC-Mag wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:05 pm^^^ +1 ^^^
The Dems don't have a lot of ways to stop the GOP. They will try all kinds of shennanigans to slow the process. Tardiness, drag out discussions, whatever they can to try and force this at least past the election.
I personally don't think the GOP should have hearings, that would be a nightmare, and gives the Dems a chance to roll out fake accusers.
We need to weaponize SCOTUS and the police to make marxism illegal - I don’t give a fuck about McCarthyism - he was fucking right. This cancer on humanity needs to be irritated. Fuck the Constitution - it’s worthless anyways - what do we have to loose at this point?
Mao is coming for your children.
No - Anyone found to support marxism is prohibited from elected office. Period. Prohibited from teaching in schools (public and private). Prohibited from being on internet tv or radio. That is not in conformance with constitution.
Declare marxists terrorists...
-
- Posts: 18733
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
This used to be the case.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change