I don't like Trump

[DBTrek]

I would think Trump shaves his legs; narcissistic males do.

I should've foreseen that Googling "Trump's legs" was going to get me more Ivanka hits than Donald.

[SuburbanFarmer]

I would think Trump shaves his legs; narcissistic males do.

Do you speak from personal experience?

[Martin Hash]

I would think Trump shaves his legs; narcissistic males do.

Do you speak from personal experience?

Dude, I can start fires just by brushing my legs against something flammable. R U a shaver?

[SuburbanFarmer]

I would think Trump shaves his legs; narcissistic males do.

Do you speak from personal experience?

Dude, I can start fires just by brushing my legs against something flammable. R U a shaver?

Nope. I make fun of shavers, mercilessly.

[clubgop]

I would think Trump shaves his legs; narcissistic males do.

Do you speak from personal experience?

Dude, I can start fires just by brushing my legs against something flammable. R U a shaver?

Used to, just the legs when I was in HS, but then my arms and chest got growing so I was like all or nothing and then I figured ain't no one got time for that. That was especially true in the army.

[clubgop]

I would think Trump shaves his legs; narcissistic males do.

I should've foreseen that Googling "Trump's legs" was going to get me more Ivanka hits than Donald.

You sound disappointed about that?

[DBTrek]

You sound disappointed about that?

Disappointed in myself, for not having foreseen it.
Good with the images tho!

[clubgop]

I included the link not long after I posted it. If it had been a recent edit, there would be an edit note on the post, retard. Your "observation" is bullshit. And you likely know it, but again...want to save face. You're not good at that.

FB and Twitter have the same right to delete anything PragerU or Martin posts on their property, as Martin has a right to delete posts made on his property. That isn't a violation of free speech. You don't have a "right" to a platform. And even then, Twitter didn't delete any of Trump's tweets. They added a silly little digital version of a post-it note. How fucking overly-sensitive does a national leader have to be to start threatening to shut down a private business because it offends his pathetic insecurities and victimhood complex?

When government wants to shut media they don't like, that IS a clear threat to freedom of speech. It's the textbook definition of violating free speech. It's fortunate that your presidents at least doesn't have the power to overturn your 1st Amendment. If they did, it's heartwarming to know that you'd just stand on the sidelines and act like you're a conservative and pretend that you thought the 1st Amendment always was a bit dodgy...

So suddenly the socialist, nagging about income inequality, pro censorship, leftist care about free speech? That the multibillionaire oligarch technocrat can run their business anyway they see fit with no regulation or oversight? It must be because the censorship runs with their establishment neolib ways.

Guilt by association games are best if your associations are coherent or at least stick, clubby.

I've always cared about freedom of speech, since day one of joining the DCF. and always stuck up for freedom of speech in discussions. I'm not a Socialist in any real (read, dictionary) sense of that word. No idea what income inequality (not that that's an issue I have advocated much for over the years) have to do with freedom of speech OR property rights? I've always defended private property rights when it comes Martin Hash's, and earlier Dan Carlin, and generally social media companies' rights to manage their content on their private property. I've always criticized those, no matter their politics, who insisted FB, Twitter, etc. violated their "freedom of speech". Government censoring you is them violating freedom of speech. Martin Hash or Mark Zuckerberg censoring you is not.

If you delude yourself into thinking that I am "hypocritical" because what I say doesn't correspond to the "Team" you imagine me to be on should think/say, the problem isn't me or what I say. It's your ridiculous associations of me belonging to your fantasy political teams. I don't say what you think "my team" should say, because I don't belong on that team, at all.

It was a broadside at all the usual suspects. You had the TDS afflicted hanging by your balls. You took the opportunity to shake them off. Good for you. As for the subject, to compare a small message board to a monopolistic ad agency that hoovers up your personal information and IP for its own purpose acting like a publisher and not a platform is a ridiculous activity that I won't even entertain.

[clubgop]

You sound disappointed about that?

Disappointed in myself, for not having foreseen it.
Good with the images tho!

[SuburbanFarmer]

Doctor?

BFB41E03-00B6-4203-9B07-CB0A25B2E548.jpeg