I don't like Trump

[pineapplemike]

i proudly wear my stein-mart suit cause i'm not some faygot like faydaralon

[pineapplemike]

actual photo of daralon i personally took at the store the other day

get a load of this guy

[pineapplemike]

nice sandals

[SuburbanFarmer]

Forgot to tan your flattop gay guy.

[Montegriffo]

Hash the Fash wrote;
There’s probably loads of threads titled, “I don’t like Trump” there. Your fingers are gonna get tired.

If it walks and it talks like a duck,
and deletes like a censorious cuck,
It's quite clear to see,
there's no liberty,
so as you want, off shall I fuck

You'll notice I said "deletes like"
He's removing our posts just ask Mike,
It's clearly his right,
on that I'll not fight.
but liberty's been told "take a hike"

This post it won't be here for long,
on that you can bet your house on.
When Hash the Fash wakes,
and his little fist shakes
my poem will surely be gone.


Bye y'all...

[clubgop]

I posted a link to Trump's tweet, retard. Look at the previous page.

You mean the one that you didn't have a link to before on? Suave... really suave... and yeah, I quoted you before you changed it top of the page, so pound sand, I'm not "retarded" I am thought observant enough that you are bullshitting in an attempt to make yourself look like less of a fool than you have already proved yourself of being.

In any case, I looked at your "proof" and Twitter, Facebook, and others have attempted to reduce or remove the "conservative voice" through Twitter and Facebook. It has been widely accepted as a fact for quite some time. How it's no longer a fact, is beyond me.

PragerU has been muted on Facebook (they are actually bringing a lawsuit against them for their actions) And other people have been banned, blocked, etc from Twitter. Hell, Look at Martin, he's far from Conservative, and he's been shunned...

I included the link not long after I posted it. If it had been a recent edit, there would be an edit note on the post, retard. Your "observation" is bullshit. And you likely know it, but again...want to save face. You're not good at that.

FB and Twitter have the same right to delete anything PragerU or Martin posts on their property, as Martin has a right to delete posts made on his property. That isn't a violation of free speech. You don't have a "right" to a platform. And even then, Twitter didn't delete any of Trump's tweets. They added a silly little digital version of a post-it note. How fucking overly-sensitive does a national leader have to be to start threatening to shut down a private business because it offends his pathetic insecurities and victimhood complex?

When government wants to shut media they don't like, that IS a clear threat to freedom of speech. It's the textbook definition of violating free speech. It's fortunate that your presidents at least doesn't have the power to overturn your 1st Amendment. If they did, it's heartwarming to know that you'd just stand on the sidelines and act like you're a conservative and pretend that you thought the 1st Amendment always was a bit dodgy...

So suddenly the socialist, nagging about income inequality, pro censorship, leftist care about free speech? That the multibillionaire oligarch technocrat can run their business anyway they see fit with no regulation or oversight? It must be because the censorship runs with their establishment neolib ways.

[BjornP]

You mean the one that you didn't have a link to before on? Suave... really suave... and yeah, I quoted you before you changed it top of the page, so pound sand, I'm not "retarded" I am thought observant enough that you are bullshitting in an attempt to make yourself look like less of a fool than you have already proved yourself of being.

In any case, I looked at your "proof" and Twitter, Facebook, and others have attempted to reduce or remove the "conservative voice" through Twitter and Facebook. It has been widely accepted as a fact for quite some time. How it's no longer a fact, is beyond me.

PragerU has been muted on Facebook (they are actually bringing a lawsuit against them for their actions) And other people have been banned, blocked, etc from Twitter. Hell, Look at Martin, he's far from Conservative, and he's been shunned...

I included the link not long after I posted it. If it had been a recent edit, there would be an edit note on the post, retard. Your "observation" is bullshit. And you likely know it, but again...want to save face. You're not good at that.

FB and Twitter have the same right to delete anything PragerU or Martin posts on their property, as Martin has a right to delete posts made on his property. That isn't a violation of free speech. You don't have a "right" to a platform. And even then, Twitter didn't delete any of Trump's tweets. They added a silly little digital version of a post-it note. How fucking overly-sensitive does a national leader have to be to start threatening to shut down a private business because it offends his pathetic insecurities and victimhood complex?

When government wants to shut media they don't like, that IS a clear threat to freedom of speech. It's the textbook definition of violating free speech. It's fortunate that your presidents at least doesn't have the power to overturn your 1st Amendment. If they did, it's heartwarming to know that you'd just stand on the sidelines and act like you're a conservative and pretend that you thought the 1st Amendment always was a bit dodgy...

So suddenly the socialist, nagging about income inequality, pro censorship, leftist care about free speech? That the multibillionaire oligarch technocrat can run their business anyway they see fit with no regulation or oversight? It must be because the censorship runs with their establishment neolib ways.

Guilt by association games are best if your associations are coherent or at least stick, clubby.

I've always cared about freedom of speech, since day one of joining the DCF. and always stuck up for freedom of speech in discussions. I'm not a Socialist in any real (read, dictionary) sense of that word. No idea what income inequality (not that that's an issue I have advocated much for over the years) have to do with freedom of speech OR property rights? I've always defended private property rights when it comes Martin Hash's, and earlier Dan Carlin, and generally social media companies' rights to manage their content on their private property. I've always criticized those, no matter their politics, who insisted FB, Twitter, etc. violated their "freedom of speech". Government censoring you is them violating freedom of speech. Martin Hash or Mark Zuckerberg censoring you is not.

If you delude yourself into thinking that I am "hypocritical" because what I say doesn't correspond to the "Team" you imagine me to be on should think/say, the problem isn't me or what I say. It's your ridiculous associations of me belonging to your fantasy political teams. I don't say what you think "my team" should say, because I don't belong on that team, at all.

[heydaralon]

actual photo of daralon i personally took at the store the other day

get a load of this guy

Not even a recent picture of me. Try again dude, I wouldn't be caught dead in that outfit after Cinco De Mayo. The fat you see in that picture is water weight. I'm a lot skinnier irl btw

[DBTrek]

I think it's a photoshop.
Those are clearly Trump's legs.
No one else has that hue of orange.

[Martin Hash]

I would think Trump shaves his legs; narcissistic males do.