That could change, but thus far, based on the available evidence, that is the caseSpeaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 5:31 pmPartyOf5 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:33 pmWhat makes you think you'll be immune once you get it?Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 1:33 pmI kind of want to get it over with, myself. Then I have the rest of the year plus-long lock down to do heavy training (which I can't do if I want to keep my immune system up) and hiking all Summer.
Also getting it over with now means I can help neighbors who are more likely to get a tougher case. Once I am immune, I can help them.
The best evidence we have is a lasting immunity once you recover.
SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
*yip*
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Actually all the evidence I have seen points to the opposite but I don't pay much attention to it. I think it's mostly bullshit.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Nah. The tests aren't 100%, people testing positive after testing negative after contracting the disease, seems to be attributable to inaccurate testing, at least so far. That could change, but right now, StA's assessment is accurate, based on the currently available evidence, at least on that front.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:08 pmActually all the evidence I have seen points to the opposite but I don't pay much attention to it. I think it's mostly bullshit.
Unfortunately the Chicoms insist on keeping people in the dark with their totally bullshit numbers and obvious cover up, so that doesn't help.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Anyway, my work keeps importing Busty Curvy Brunette Nurses for the nightshift thanks to the outbreak, so there's another one now working for next several nights, best war war ever. Perfect timing on this six night shifts in a row.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
One of the residents who had the virus passed way at St. Joe's, but she was on palliative care anyway before the virus.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
- Location: suiþiuþu
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
This is peculiar. When I google "Charles J DeWitt" I get this result page. But only when logged in to Google. If I log out I get more normal results.Cid wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 2:36 pmHey bitch tits, I gave my name, dox my ass and come find me.
Edit: Obviously after this pandemic I don't want you to actually die/get sick getting to me, but again, I'll happily get bloody on this one since you seem to be keen.
Edit 2: And again, I'm not not busy, and you seem to be retired/drinking/smoking weed, so I FIGURE YOU GOT TIME.
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Why Cid as his name here if his initials are CJD?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
The most likely explanation is that the infection waxes and wanes quite a lot, and people can very well test negative when they are still fighting the infection, only for the infection to become resurgent for a while.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:08 pmActually all the evidence I have seen points to the opposite but I don't pay much attention to it. I think it's mostly bullshit.
I have watched a fair number of testimonials about the infection and this seems like a very common problem. It gets better only to suddenly turn for the worse. It's a really nasty bug on so many levels, but there does not yet exist a lot of evidence to suggest you won't be immune to this thing for at least a while after you do finally fight it off.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
*yip*Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:40 amThe most likely explanation is that the infection waxes and wanes quite a lot, and people can very well test negative when they are still fighting the infection, only for the infection to become resurgent for a while.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:08 pmActually all the evidence I have seen points to the opposite but I don't pay much attention to it. I think it's mostly bullshit.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
i was told people were going to be dropping dead in the streets and convulsing from seizures