So Trump ordered General Soleimani Assassinated, and now people are crying for WWIII....

[Fife]

The claim that the Soleimani strike was prompted by a recently discovered and imminent threat is facially and patently false.

IOW, an out-and-out lie.

[StCapps]

The claim that the Soleimani strike was prompted by a recently discovered and imminent threat is facially and patently false.

IOW, an out-and-out lie.

They attacked your embassy, and just attacked your air base. What lies? How does that not count as an imminent threat when they attack you and keep attacking you?

[pineapplemike]

The claim that the Soleimani strike was prompted by a recently discovered and imminent threat is facially and patently false.

IOW, an out-and-out lie.

we can say this all night and day but if the secretary of state claims the threat is imminent then who disputes the justification? i saw an headline that pelosi was bringing up the war powers articles but i didn't click on it or read it so idk. i wouldnt be mad at congress for taking back their war authority just because orange man bad

[The Conservative]

The claim that the Soleimani strike was prompted by a recently discovered and imminent threat is facially and patently false.

IOW, an out-and-out lie.

They attacked your embassy, and just attacked your air base. What lies? How does that not count as an imminent threat when they attack you and keep attacking you?

This is the part that bothers me, we got some technical black eyes here, and we aren't supposed to respond? Seriously?

[The Conservative]

The claim that the Soleimani strike was prompted by a recently discovered and imminent threat is facially and patently false.

IOW, an out-and-out lie.

we can say this all night and day but if the secretary of state claims the threat is imminent then who disputes the justification? i saw an headline that pelosi was bringing up the war powers articles but i didn't click on it or read it so idk. i wouldnt be mad at congress for taking back their war authority just because orange man bad

The bullet holes and rocket craters... you tell me....

[Speaker to Animals]

The claim that the Soleimani strike was prompted by a recently discovered and imminent threat is facially and patently false.

IOW, an out-and-out lie.

Dicks out for Tulsi at this point.

[StCapps]

The claim that the Soleimani strike was prompted by a recently discovered and imminent threat is facially and patently false.

IOW, an out-and-out lie.

Dicks out for Tulsi at this point.

Get Dat Joe Biden Money, stop waiting on 2020 pipe dreams.

[pineapplemike]

hush everyone, the president of the united states is going to speak and bring clarity to the matter any moment now..

[Speaker to Animals]

hush everyone, the president of the united states is going to speak and bring clarity to the matter any moment now..

Fake and Gay.

[Montegriffo]

u wot m8

Huh, if Cunty is referring to me then he is wide of the mark as I am on record as criticising Gabbard for running cover for Assad's chemical attacks on Syrian civilians and have not feigned support for her at all. In fact I called her an appeaser who was an unwitting ally for Putin and Assad and disputed her claim that all the resistance forces in Syria were ISIS terrorists as the Kurds are clearly not.
Same shit different day...

Mad at Tulsi for appeasing Syria while he cheers on appeasement with Iran. No obvious double standard there.

Arguing that the assassination of Soleimani was a strategic error that could end in escalating tit for tat reprisals is not appeasement but I'm not surprised in the slightest that you would build that strawman rather than address any of the other opinions I've posted today. Either way, the claim that I feigned support for Gabbard is a fabrication to support Cunty's partisan hack narrative. His next move is likely to be claiming that he wasn't referring to me but I think we all know that is bollocks due to his finishing the post with ''same shit different day''.
Same shit different day.