The Conservative wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2019 11:19 am
You know who told me that ”Army Strong, not Smart.”
A recruiter.
And as for today, almost no math, everything is GPS based and put into a computer practically.
The only thing they need to get right is elevation and direction.
If you were talking 30 years ago, you may be right, but today... Fuck. Everything is nearly automated. The soldiers of today are spoiled.
A recruiter from...the US
Army? Or possibly a recruiter from another branch, who made a joke about the army to you...which you took a little too seriously, perhaps?
Anyway, since you didn't get where I was going: If their CO's "tell them what to do", and their CO's are army, then unless you want to make the case that everyone up the rank of army generals are "not smart", your guesswork about the army is just another example of you just writing something to write something.
And no, they don't just need to get elevation and direction right. They need to figure out what shells and what sort of powder package (or however the correct translation of that is) and when to use them for best effect. And do you understand what tactics are? That doesn't require "smarts" in your world?
And even if they are "spoiled", being spoiled doesn't equal "strong but not smart", does it?
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.