[s]YouTube stuff[/s] cancelled
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
I never had any time for Diana either.
Neither did the press until she died.
After she died she was suddenly a saint.
Should have had her seat belt on.
Neither did the press until she died.
After she died she was suddenly a saint.
Should have had her seat belt on.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: YouTube stuff
I was more mad at the British people for being mad at HM for not gushing over her.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:54 pmI never had any time for Diana either.
Neither did the press until she died.
After she died she was suddenly a saint.
Should have had her seat belt on.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: YouTube stuff
HM doesn't gush for anybody, HM is a warrior Queen at the head of Her troops, that's why I love Her.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
The grief tourism was macabre.
Good for the florists though.
Good for the florists though.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: YouTube stuff
I was face to face with the Commander-in-Chief once.
Standing before HM, she wasn't smiling, she was deadly serious, looked me in the eyes.
Said "how are you finding the army, Corporal?"
"Privilege to serve, Maam" says I.
"Very good" says she.
Stone cold, military bearing, the hair stood up on my neck.
Standing before HM, she wasn't smiling, she was deadly serious, looked me in the eyes.
Said "how are you finding the army, Corporal?"
"Privilege to serve, Maam" says I.
"Very good" says she.
Stone cold, military bearing, the hair stood up on my neck.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
''I just check the local bars Maam'' would have been a funnier answer.
She's well known for her sense of humour and you would have got a smile out of her.
She's well known for her sense of humour and you would have got a smile out of her.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: YouTube stuff
I wasn't going to be a smart ass for the one time I would be speaking to my Empress.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 9:15 pm''I just check the local bars Maam'' would have been a funnier answer.
She's well known for her sense of humour and you would have got a smile out of her.
She gave me a little nod, like "well done", that was enough for me.
I was speaking for my great grandfather who fought the Great War
He never met George V, this was for the record, for my ancestors.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: YouTube stuff
Quite the British display of ecological waste and selfishness.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 9:05 pmThe grief tourism was macabre.
Good for the florists though.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
Absolutely. The Palace had to request that people stop bringing flowers in the end.Fife wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 9:05 amQuite the British display of ecological waste and selfishness.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 9:05 pmThe grief tourism was macabre.
Good for the florists though.
A better gesture would have been to donate to the Princess's landmine charity.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
Watching the full interview now.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 6:53 pm
Yeah yeah, you have no recollection.
Perfectly reasonable defense.
''Why did you go and stay with Epstein after his release from prison for sexual offenses?''
''Because I wanted to tell him we could no longer be friends and I couldn't be seen with him.''
''Why did you not tell him that in a phone call?''
''Because I thought that was a cowards way to tell him.''
''you were photographed in Central Park with him''
''That was when I was having the conversation about us not being seen together''
''Why did you stay for 4 days?''
''Because I had other things to do in New York and it was convenient to stay at his place''
''Miss Roberts has accused you of having sex with her when she was 17?''
''I have no recollection of ever meeting her''
''There is a photo of you with an arm around her waist how do you explain that?''
''I can't, I have no recollection...''
''Are you saying it is a faked photo?''
''It has not been possible to prove whether it is real or not''
Yeah right.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.