Ah, you're right. I was confusing the two things.BjornP wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:09 pmNot the same thing. A no-deal Brexit has been ruled out quite recently, after the fact. And as for the supreme court, wasn't that in reference to Boris' suspension of parliament? Otherwise, do you have a link to the story that explicitly states that the British supreme court found that a no-deal Brexit would not have a legal mandate?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:54 pmA no-deal Brexit has indeed been ruled out by the courts. A vote of 11-0 in the Supreme Court ruled it unlawful based on the vote in Parliament where it was argued that no one voted for no-deal in the referendum.BjornP wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:49 pm
Curious, then, that no one has succeeded bringing that claim to your courts. You'd think that if the narrative of "Brexit can be invalidated if it's a no-deal Brexit because that wasn't one of the specific referendum questions" was true, something would have happened by now.
It was Parliament which ruled out a no-deal Brexit.