The alternatives to not allowing ticket transfers were charging honest people more money for their ticket, using funds from other council projects to cover the shortfall or even selling the car park to private contractors. That car park requires maintenance it is not free to run.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:06 amMontegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:03 amIt wasn't. It wasn't even the same space.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:00 am
Me not giving money to you is not me stealing from you. I would actually have to take something from you.
The space was already paid for. The state might make that illegal, but the state calling something "stealing" does not make it actually stealing. Get real.
He was trying to encourage me to steal from taxpayers.
Which part of ''minimum charge'' are you struggling to understand?
You paid for time in the parking garage. Was that time used up? No. The man asked if you'd transfer the time to him so he wouldn't have to pay and the time you paid for would not go to waste. The state made that illegal because they enjoy double charging for parking time (which arguably is actually stealing). You made the call to not violate the law.
What he asked you to do was illegal, but it wasn't stealing. Just because something is illegal does not make it immoral. Sometimes it's immoral to not violate an unjust law. In this case, it's meh. Whatever. Pat yourself on the back for not breaking the law, but don't pretend like the guy was asking you to do something morally wrong.
Who was the biggest arsehole?
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Who was the biggest arsehole?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Who was the biggest arsehole?
Uh.. no..Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:20 amThe alternatives to not allowing ticket transfers were charging honest people more money for their ticket, using funds from other council projects to cover the shortfall or even selling the car park to private contractors. That car park requires maintenance it is not free to run.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:06 amMontegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:03 am
It wasn't. It wasn't even the same space.
He was trying to encourage me to steal from taxpayers.
Which part of ''minimum charge'' are you struggling to understand?
You paid for time in the parking garage. Was that time used up? No. The man asked if you'd transfer the time to him so he wouldn't have to pay and the time you paid for would not go to waste. The state made that illegal because they enjoy double charging for parking time (which arguably is actually stealing). You made the call to not violate the law.
What he asked you to do was illegal, but it wasn't stealing. Just because something is illegal does not make it immoral. Sometimes it's immoral to not violate an unjust law. In this case, it's meh. Whatever. Pat yourself on the back for not breaking the law, but don't pretend like the guy was asking you to do something morally wrong.
They were double charging for the same usage of the parking garage. They can raise or lower the rates all they want, and people will decide whether it is economically worth their money to park there.
The parking garage should charge the maximum rate it can get while keeping the garage mostly full. Charging less could be called stealing if I used your logic of "what about the library!?". Charging more would just result in lower revenue. Charging anything other than the efficient price would be stupid.
Double charging for the same time is dishonest, in my opinion, and arguably stealing, especially if those fuckers used tax dollars to build the fucking garage in the first place.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Who was the biggest arsehole?
I hate theft.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:07 amLOL
I am pretty sure he does hate them, along with roads.
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: Who was the biggest arsehole?
Nothing's stolen. I presume the guy bought the ticketMontegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:37 amIf I offer to sell you a stolen bicycle cheaply am I being neighbourly?California wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:29 amWhy on earth would you have a problem with this?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:27 amI should have taken it from him and ripped it up. That way he wouldn't have been able to offer it to anyone else.
Neighbours don't steal from each other.
Do you want to destroy used items that people resell as well?
Recycling is good, stealing from fellow taxpayers is not.
Then there's the fact I would be committing an offence liable to a fine over 80 times the cost of the ticket. This carpark is under camera surveillance and right next to a council building which includes the transport department. How do I know I'm not being set up?
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Who was the biggest arsehole?
The costs of a council car park reflect the costs of maintenance. I am still wearing away the tarmac and using the lights provided etc whether I dodge the minimum charge or not.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:22 amUh.. no..Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:20 amThe alternatives to not allowing ticket transfers were charging honest people more money for their ticket, using funds from other council projects to cover the shortfall or even selling the car park to private contractors. That car park requires maintenance it is not free to run.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:06 am
You paid for time in the parking garage. Was that time used up? No. The man asked if you'd transfer the time to him so he wouldn't have to pay and the time you paid for would not go to waste. The state made that illegal because they enjoy double charging for parking time (which arguably is actually stealing). You made the call to not violate the law.
What he asked you to do was illegal, but it wasn't stealing. Just because something is illegal does not make it immoral. Sometimes it's immoral to not violate an unjust law. In this case, it's meh. Whatever. Pat yourself on the back for not breaking the law, but don't pretend like the guy was asking you to do something morally wrong.
They were double charging for the same usage of the parking garage. They can raise or lower the rates all they want, and people will decide whether it is economically worth their money to park there.
The parking garage should charge the maximum rate it can get while keeping the garage mostly full. Charging less could be called stealing if I used your logic of "what about the library!?". Charging more would just result in lower revenue. Charging anything other than the efficient price would be stupid.
Double charging for the same time is dishonest, in my opinion, and arguably stealing, especially if those fuckers used tax dollars to build the fucking garage in the first place.
If council revenues were used to tarmac the car park in the first place then it is even more important that those costs are recovered by the users or everyone pays for it whether they use it or not.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Who was the biggest arsehole?
He didn't buy it for me. He bought it for himself and tried to breach the contract he made with the council by transferring it to me.California wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:37 amNothing's stolen. I presume the guy bought the ticketMontegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:37 amIf I offer to sell you a stolen bicycle cheaply am I being neighbourly?California wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:29 am
Why on earth would you have a problem with this?
Do you want to destroy used items that people resell as well?
Recycling is good, stealing from fellow taxpayers is not.
Then there's the fact I would be committing an offence liable to a fine over 80 times the cost of the ticket. This carpark is under camera surveillance and right next to a council building which includes the transport department. How do I know I'm not being set up?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: Who was the biggest arsehole?
This is a core problem. People think that things they don't like or think are immoral should be illegal, when the government shouldn't even get involved in the vast majority of issuesSpeaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 8:33 amYou are just upset that illegal != immoral.
Lots of things are illegal but not immoral. Lots of things are legal by not moral.
Welcome to fallen state of Mankind, I guess.
You can have a demon tranny story time where kids are exposed to a pedophile in London. Totally legal. Giving the parking spot time you bought and paid for to another person.. illegal. /shrug.
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: Who was the biggest arsehole?
No, he bought an amount of time. It is up to him to do what he wants with the time he boughtMontegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:45 amHe didn't buy it for me. He bought it for himself and tried to breach the contract he made with the council by transferring it to me.California wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:37 amNothing's stolen. I presume the guy bought the ticketMontegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:37 am
If I offer to sell you a stolen bicycle cheaply am I being neighbourly?
Recycling is good, stealing from fellow taxpayers is not.
Then there's the fact I would be committing an offence liable to a fine over 80 times the cost of the ticket. This carpark is under camera surveillance and right next to a council building which includes the transport department. How do I know I'm not being set up?
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Who was the biggest arsehole?
''Buy a drink or fuck off loser.''
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.