StCapps wrote: Thu Aug 29, 2019 6:28 am
"Capps disagrees with me, must be spam" - Dumbest People On This Forum
We'll add straw-manning to tired old cliches. Neither of which is an argument and is therefore just more spam.
I shan't respond to any more spam.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Montegriffo wrote: Thu Aug 29, 2019 5:41 am
What election results?
It was an advisory referendum with zero validity in law according to the courts.
Imposing no-deal Brexit against the will of both Parliament and the people is not Democracy.
The will of the people has already been expressed. If it has "zero validity in law", as you pretend, it's odd that the EU hasn't declared all the talk about Brexit invalid, isn't it?
I'm pretending nothing. The validity in law of the advisory referendum was successfully challenged in the courts. The EU is respecting the sovereignty of an individual member and bows to Parliamentary supremacy as is correct for them to do.
The talk about Brexit isn't invalid. It's the attempted imposition of a no-deal Brexit against the will of Parliament and the people which is invalid.
Dude, fuck off with your "against the will of the people" bullshit:
The will of the people has already been expressed. If it has "zero validity in law", as you pretend, it's odd that the EU hasn't declared all the talk about Brexit invalid, isn't it?
I'm pretending nothing. The validity in law of the advisory referendum was successfully challenged in the courts. The EU is respecting the sovereignty of an individual member and bows to Parliamentary supremacy as is correct for them to do.
The talk about Brexit isn't invalid. It's the attempted imposition of a no-deal Brexit against the will of Parliament and the people which is invalid.
Dude, fuck off with your "against the will of the people" bullshit:
So you admit that 68% of those polled don't want a no-deal Brexit.
What's your point?
Also, ''a poll conducted for the Daily Telegraph''.
Maybe you are not aware that Boris Johnson wrote a column for the ''Torygraph'' until he was made PM.
Talk about bovine excrement...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
The will of the people has already been expressed. If it has "zero validity in law", as you pretend, it's odd that the EU hasn't declared all the talk about Brexit invalid, isn't it?
I'm pretending nothing. The validity in law of the advisory referendum was successfully challenged in the courts. The EU is respecting the sovereignty of an individual member and bows to Parliamentary supremacy as is correct for them to do.
The talk about Brexit isn't invalid. It's the attempted imposition of a no-deal Brexit against the will of Parliament and the people which is invalid.
Dude, fuck off with your "against the will of the people" bullshit:
There's always a poll to confirm what you want to hear. The only true poll would be another referendum.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Montegriffo wrote: Thu Aug 29, 2019 10:04 am
There's always a poll to confirm what you want to hear. The only true poll would be another referendum.
The only true poll was the first referendum, you lost, get over it. Just because some other polls suggest your side might do better now, doesn't mean a do over is warranted.
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Aug 29, 2019 10:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
