How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag » Mon Apr 22, 2019 11:21 am

ooky wrote:
Thu Jun 07, 2018 5:25 pm
Lay out your arguments for me. I am completely flummoxed when I come here and 1) see very, very little about any new developments that are crazy serious, and 2) what comments there are just seem to completely dismiss the entire idea as so stupid no discussion is needed.

Here is what I see hard evidence for that has not been successfully contradicted by the Trump administration. Sure, they have screamed “13 angry Democrats” (also not true), “witch hunt”, “no collusion”, while giving no evidence for their positions at all, just catch phrases and blanket “there’s nothing here” statements. In point of fact, over time we’ve learned again and again that things that were categorically denied by the administration turned out to be true, and we are only given explanations like “it’s not a crime to lie to the press”.

1. In 2016, Putin’s regime mounted information warfare against the United States. Their aim was to disrupt the election and get Trump elected. The CIA determined this as fact in Dec 2016. This conclusion has only had more evidence to support it since then, to the point we now know which Facebook memes were from Russian accounts, that they targeted battleground states, and Homeland Security testified to the Senate in June 2017 that Russian hackers targeted voting systems in 21 states.
a. Yes, US and others do this and worse to other countries. That doesn’t make it right. I consider it a terrible stain on our country that we do this. That argument does not clear Trump.
2. While this direct attack on our democracy was underway, Trump campaign was covertly trying to collude with Russia – sending Papodopolous, and it is highly likely that Manafort was reaching out through his connections as well. We do know Manafort was who you should have as campaign manager if you DID want to have a secret direct connection to Russia, as he’s been paid at least $12.7 MM in illegal cash from the pro-Russian Ukranian president Victor Yanukovych and has worked as an advisor to him and others for over 10 years. Manafort is currently under formal indictment for conspiracy against the US.
3. We know for a fact that when the Russian government explicitly offered them help, they jumped at the chance, and have lied about it ever since last summer, omitting this from forms, first saying it was about adoption, then admitting they were interested in Russian dirt on Clinton. Now the only thing they haven’t formally admitted, though Guiliani did, is whether Trump knew about it. And right after Don Jr got the info that there was Russian dirt, the Trump campaign was making announcements that they had big news to share on Clinton.
4. The Trump campaign repeatedly gaslit America in 2016 and said none of this was happening, providing cover for the Russian activities while they were happening.
5. The Trump campaign aligned itself against foreign nationals and assisted a foreign adversary for their own gain. This is illegal and a basic betrayal of our country.

The only question that remains, and the only possible shred of truth to the “No Collusion” tweets, is that we don’t yet know if Trump directly contacted Russians himself, or if he just knew it was going on and did nothing to stop it or change elements of his campaign that were seeking to further this.

It is not a witch hunt when an investigation secures 17 criminal indictments and already 5 guilty pleas. Number of indictments or guilty pleas for Benghazi or emails? 0 and 0, and those investigations lasted longer than this one already.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



Sorry folks, couldn't help myself :D
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by Ph64 » Mon Apr 22, 2019 11:34 am

C-Mag wrote:
Mon Apr 22, 2019 11:21 am
ooky wrote:
Thu Jun 07, 2018 5:25 pm
Lay out your arguments for me. I am completely flummoxed when I come here and 1) see very, very little about any new developments that are crazy serious, and 2) what comments there are just seem to completely dismiss the entire idea as so stupid no discussion is needed.

Here is what I see hard evidence for that has not been successfully contradicted by the Trump administration. Sure, they have screamed “13 angry Democrats” (also not true), “witch hunt”, “no collusion”, while giving no evidence for their positions at all, just catch phrases and blanket “there’s nothing here” statements. In point of fact, over time we’ve learned again and again that things that were categorically denied by the administration turned out to be true, and we are only given explanations like “it’s not a crime to lie to the press”.

1. In 2016, Putin’s regime mounted information warfare against the United States. Their aim was to disrupt the election and get Trump elected. The CIA determined this as fact in Dec 2016. This conclusion has only had more evidence to support it since then, to the point we now know which Facebook memes were from Russian accounts, that they targeted battleground states, and Homeland Security testified to the Senate in June 2017 that Russian hackers targeted voting systems in 21 states.
a. Yes, US and others do this and worse to other countries. That doesn’t make it right. I consider it a terrible stain on our country that we do this. That argument does not clear Trump.
2. While this direct attack on our democracy was underway, Trump campaign was covertly trying to collude with Russia – sending Papodopolous, and it is highly likely that Manafort was reaching out through his connections as well. We do know Manafort was who you should have as campaign manager if you DID want to have a secret direct connection to Russia, as he’s been paid at least $12.7 MM in illegal cash from the pro-Russian Ukranian president Victor Yanukovych and has worked as an advisor to him and others for over 10 years. Manafort is currently under formal indictment for conspiracy against the US.
3. We know for a fact that when the Russian government explicitly offered them help, they jumped at the chance, and have lied about it ever since last summer, omitting this from forms, first saying it was about adoption, then admitting they were interested in Russian dirt on Clinton. Now the only thing they haven’t formally admitted, though Guiliani did, is whether Trump knew about it. And right after Don Jr got the info that there was Russian dirt, the Trump campaign was making announcements that they had big news to share on Clinton.
4. The Trump campaign repeatedly gaslit America in 2016 and said none of this was happening, providing cover for the Russian activities while they were happening.
5. The Trump campaign aligned itself against foreign nationals and assisted a foreign adversary for their own gain. This is illegal and a basic betrayal of our country.

The only question that remains, and the only possible shred of truth to the “No Collusion” tweets, is that we don’t yet know if Trump directly contacted Russians himself, or if he just knew it was going on and did nothing to stop it or change elements of his campaign that were seeking to further this.

It is not a witch hunt when an investigation secures 17 criminal indictments and already 5 guilty pleas. Number of indictments or guilty pleas for Benghazi or emails? 0 and 0, and those investigations lasted longer than this one already.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



Sorry folks, couldn't help myself :D
Image

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by TheReal_ND » Mon Apr 22, 2019 11:59 am

when I come here and 1) see very, very little about any new developments that are crazy serious, and 2) what comments there are just seem to completely dismiss the entire idea as so stupid no discussion is needed.
Accurate

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag » Mon Apr 22, 2019 12:09 pm

TheReal_ND wrote:
Mon Apr 22, 2019 11:59 am
when I come here and 1) see very, very little about any new developments that are crazy serious, and 2) what comments there are just seem to completely dismiss the entire idea as so stupid no discussion is needed.
Accurate
:clap:
Yes, she got that right.

But don't forget Nuke, this Russia stuff is "CRAZY SERIOUS".
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag » Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:48 pm

Mueller is now a joke

Image
Image
Image

Closing theme song
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:57 pm

A lot of effort going into discrediting Mueller.
Page after page in the RW media.
You could almost call it a conspiracy.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by Ph64 » Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:59 pm

The only question that remains, and the only possible shred of truth to the “No Collusion” tweets, is that we don’t yet know if Trump directly contacted Russians himself, or if he just knew it was going on and did nothing to stop it or change elements of his campaign that were seeking to further this.
Isn't there a 3rd option missing there? As in:
"Trump didn't directly contact the Russians, and didn't know it was going on (if it even was)"?

Isn't that what "no collusion" means? Interesting bias that you would leave that option out. :think:

Also interesting that your obvious bias there implies "guilty, no proof of it though yet"...

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag » Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:10 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:57 pm
A lot of effort going into discrediting Mueller.
Page after page in the RW media.
You could almost call it a conspiracy.
He discredited himself with that testimony, even Lefties who have a brain know it.

Michael Moore

@MMFlint
A frail old man, unable to remember things, stumbling, refusing to answer basic questions...I said it in 2017 and Mueller confirmed it today — All you pundits and moderates and lame Dems who told the public to put their faith in the esteemed Robert Mueller — just STFU from now on
39.7K
10:31 AM - Jul 24, 2019
Mueller is so much a joke, that not one single Democrat mentioned him or his report during last nights debate.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag » Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:13 pm

Ph64 wrote:
Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:59 pm
The only question that remains, and the only possible shred of truth to the “No Collusion” tweets, is that we don’t yet know if Trump directly contacted Russians himself, or if he just knew it was going on and did nothing to stop it or change elements of his campaign that were seeking to further this.
Isn't there a 3rd option missing there? As in:
"Trump didn't directly contact the Russians, and didn't know it was going on (if it even was)"?

Isn't that what "no collusion" means? Interesting bias that you would leave that option out. :think:

Also interesting that your obvious bias there implies "guilty, no proof of it though yet"...


Which is it ?
Is Trump an evil mastermind who's been under investigation for the last 3 years and is so diabolically, genius and stable that he's fooled the best and brightest in the FBI, or...…………………..

Is Trump a bumbling fool, sloppy con man criminal ? As he's painted by the media. Both can't be true.


There is a 3rd option, he may be the cleanest President in modern history.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by Fife » Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:25 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:57 pm
A lot of effort going into discrediting Mueller.
Page after page in the RW media.
You could almost call it a conspiracy.
Mueller is the real victim in this whole mess.

:goteam: :drunk: