-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:58 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:53 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:45 am
StCapps wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:16 am
Who would think that? No artificial barrier humans can construct is even close to that effective.
Everybody knows how to curb illegal immigration.
Go after employers that are giving jobs to illegals and follow up on overstays on visas (which is how most illegals enter the country).
The wall is just an expensive, habitat disturbing, environmental disaster of a vanity project.
And that never happened while under Obama, who deported more Illegals than Trump... so why not? Yet if it was attempted under Trump, he'd be called a racist...
Illegals
should be deported. I've never said otherwise.
Asylum seekers should be treated as human beings though.
Race or religion should never be the reason to refuse asylum (or entry to the country on valid visas).
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:01 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:58 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:53 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:45 am
Everybody knows how to curb illegal immigration.
Go after employers that are giving jobs to illegals and follow up on overstays on visas (which is how most illegals enter the country).
The wall is just an expensive, habitat disturbing, environmental disaster of a vanity project.
And that never happened while under Obama, who deported more Illegals than Trump... so why not? Yet if it was attempted under Trump, he'd be called a racist...
Illegals
should be deported. I've never said otherwise.
Asylum seekers should be treated as human beings though.
Race or religion should never be the reason to refuse asylum (or entry to the country on valid visas).
Those attempting to get into this country are claiming asylum, the majority don't deserve it. And just because they have a child does not give them any right or need of it.
The US is not a baby sitting entity...
#NotOneRedCent
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:11 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:01 am
Those attempting to get into this country are claiming asylum, the majority don't deserve it. And just because they have a child does not give them any right or need of it.
The US is not a baby sitting entity...
Does any of that contradict anything I've said or are you just arguing with yourself?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Post
by StCapps » Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:14 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:45 am
StCapps wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 8:16 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 7:57 am
If you think the wall is going to be anywhere near as effective as the English channel you are going to be seriously disappointed.
Who would think that? No artificial barrier humans can construct is even close to that effective.
Everybody knows how to curb illegal immigration.
Go after employers that are giving jobs to illegals and follow up on overstays on visas (which is how most illegals enter the country).
The wall is just an expensive, habitat disturbing, environmental disaster of a vanity project.
You can do both. A wall isn't that expensive, and doesn't have to be placed in areas were it's an environmental disaster.
*yip*
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:15 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:11 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:01 am
Those attempting to get into this country are claiming asylum, the majority don't deserve it. And just because they have a child does not give them any right or need of it.
The US is not a baby sitting entity...
Does any of that contradict anything I've said or are you just arguing with yourself?
Yes your asylum seeking people are coming with children so they can get special treatment. Have you not been keeping up with that, or are you living in your own little bubble?
#NotOneRedCent
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed Jul 24, 2019 11:22 am
Does that contradict anything I've said?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Wed Jul 24, 2019 11:24 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 11:22 am
Does that contradict anything I've said?
Comprehension and thought is not your forte is it?
#NotOneRedCent
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed Jul 24, 2019 11:34 am
Answer the question.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Wed Jul 24, 2019 11:39 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 11:34 am
Answer the question.
I already did, children are not a get into the US free card. Asylum can be done at a port of entry, not elsewhere. Attempting to get into the country illegally, and then state asylum is an immediate deportation to me.
#NotOneRedCent
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed Jul 24, 2019 11:56 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 11:39 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 11:34 am
Answer the question.
I already did, children are not a get into the US free card. Asylum can be done at a port of entry, not elsewhere. Attempting to get into the country illegally, and then state asylum is an immediate deportation to me.
Who said children should be a get in free card?
How many asylum seekers are being processed at port of entries?
The Trump administration has long said that there’s a right way to seek asylum in the United States: Come to an official port of entry at the border, then invoke the right under U.S. law to humanitarian protection.
But now, thousands of people are being barred from the U.S. precisely because they followed those rules.
Under an administration policy issued last week, most migrants who’ve passed through a third country — say, Mexico — will not even be allowed to request asylum at official border crossings.
https://www.propublica.org/article/asyl ... trump-rule#
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.