2020 election

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: 2020 election

Post by C-Mag »

Image
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: 2020 election

Post by Fife »

Image
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: 2020 election

Post by C-Mag »

:lol:
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: 2020 election

Post by C-Mag »

Dem leader Biden got 85 people to show up in Iowa. Trump plays to 100,000, with 40 hour wait time in line.

Clearly the polls are accurate
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: 2020 election

Post by StCapps »

C-Mag wrote: Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:22 pm Dem leader Biden got 85 people to show up in Iowa. Trump plays to 100,000, with 40 hour wait time in line.

Clearly the polls are accurate
The only thing the Dem candidate vs.Trump polls show at this time is who is the most likely to beat Trump of the candidates available. Obviously this far out before the primary each candidate is going to an inflated chance of winning before the primary even really starts, that is to be expected. Those polls will not accurately show Trump's support, but they are okay at comparing the Dems to each other.
*yip*
User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4652
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: 2020 election

Post by pineapplemike »

LATEST: 2020 general election head-to-heads via Fox News poll:
Biden 49%, Trump 39%
Sanders 49%, Trump 40%
Harris 42%, Trump 41%
Warren 43%, Trump 41%
Buttigieg 41%, Trump 40%
:lol:

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: 2020 election

Post by StCapps »

pineapplemike wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 8:41 am
LATEST: 2020 general election head-to-heads via Fox News poll:
Biden 49%, Trump 39%
Sanders 49%, Trump 40%
Harris 42%, Trump 41%
Warren 43%, Trump 41%
Buttigieg 41%, Trump 40%
:lol:

Biden and Sanders will do better against Trump than Harris, Warren and Buttigieg, that's the only takeaway from such polls at this point. Biden and Sanders would have to have bigger leads over Trump in head-to-head polls at this point for me to think they have a real shot, their numbers are going to go down as the primary progresses and once someone wins the nomination, then their numbers will go down even more.
*yip*
User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: 2020 election

Post by Ex-California »

Remember what the polls said in 2016?
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: 2020 election

Post by Speaker to Animals »

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: 2020 election

Post by StCapps »

California wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 10:19 am Remember what the polls said in 2016?
From Qunnipiac in late April 2015:
In a general election matchup, Clinton gets 45 percent of American voters to 43 percent for Rubio. She leads other top Republicans:
45 - 40 percent over Christie;
46 - 42 percent over Paul;
47 - 42 percent over former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee;
46 - 39 percent over Bush;
46 - 41 percent over Walker;
48 - 41 percent over U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.
Similar results skewed in the favor of the Democrat before Trump was even in the race. Factor in the anti-Trump bias that was around 3 points off, and you get similar margins of separation between the Democrat and Republican.

The head-to-head polls don't tell you much of anything until both candidates for both parties have been through the nomination process, and even then when Trump is involved, they seem to be off by around 3 points. Also when there is an incumbent POTUS their numbers are less likely to fall in head-to-head polls from now until then, while the candidate running against them is more likely to have their numbers fall as they take arrows over the course of the nomination process as people learn more about them.
*yip*