UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
Well, the House Judiciary Committee is concerned enough to look into the rising rates of reported hate crimes and investigate the possible link between the rise and divisive political rhetoric.
https://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/ ... ism-in-u-s
https://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/ ... ism-in-u-s
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
A memorial to the victims of the mass shooting in Pittsburgh in October. Hate crime reports have increased for the past three years
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
Nothing to do with free speech, or hate speech, no need to restrict speech, it will not reduce hate crimes. You seem to think restricting speech will save lives, but you have zero proof to back that up, and seem to think that anyone who disagrees with you doesn't want to save lives despite a lack of proof that your proposed policies will save lives.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 4:24 am
A memorial to the victims of the mass shooting in Pittsburgh in October. Hate crime reports have increased for the past three years
It's all about feelz with you, and you feel like you have the moral high ground for no good reason.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
I heard you the first time.
Repeating it ad infinitum doesn't make it any truer.
Repeating it ad infinitum doesn't make it any truer.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
You keep repeating the same dumb reasons you think hate speech needs to be restricted over and over again, and it doesn't make it any truer either. We also heard you the first time, but at least I repeat good arguments, unlike you.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 4:47 amI heard you the first time.
Repeating it ad infinitum doesn't make it any truer.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
If you say so.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
And you say I repeat myself, throw more stones from your glass house bro.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
I didn't realize people could die from words.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
Neither did I. Thankfully we have montegriffo to look down his noses at us, from his imaginary moral high ground, because he thinks people can die from words, and anyone who disagrees wants more hate crimes that kill people because they aren't pro "hate speech" censorship.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
We'll add that to the Bazalgette sewerage system sized pile of shit you don't know.
Goddamn it, I never thought I'd admit I miss DB nearly as much as I miss Drtrech.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.