UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Tue May 07, 2019 2:23 am

A family in London who receive around £82 million in state benefits have had another baby despite its father not having a proper job.
The mixed-race child, which is expected to live off the public purse for its whole life, has not yet been named but Alexander is apparently the front runner.
The child's 93-year-old great grandmother has received welfare ever since she was born in 1926 despite having a large private income.
The child's immigrant mother left a promising career to come into the country to live off state handouts and take advantage of our free healthcare services.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Kath » Tue May 07, 2019 5:19 am

Lol

I didn't hear about it. Was it on the news? I thought that baby was months away.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Tue May 07, 2019 5:41 am

Kath wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 5:19 am
Lol

I didn't hear about it. Was it on the news? I thought that baby was months away.
7lb 3 oz boy born 5.25am local time yesterday.
Trump has not been accused of colluding with Harry so that is probably why you have not heard about it.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Kath » Tue May 07, 2019 5:54 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 5:41 am

Trump has not been accused of colluding with Harry so that is probably why you have not heard about it.
Is he still president? I've stopped red-pilling myself. I am no longer paying attention. I'm choosing to be happy instead.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Tue May 07, 2019 6:12 am

Kath wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 5:54 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 5:41 am

Trump has not been accused of colluding with Harry so that is probably why you have not heard about it.
Is he still president? I've stopped red-pilling myself. I am no longer paying attention. I'm choosing to be happy instead.
Could be dead for all I know, there's only one story in the UK media right now.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Ex-California » Tue May 07, 2019 6:46 am

Harry and Markle are better looking than the other two
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Tue May 07, 2019 8:32 am

For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by C-Mag » Tue May 07, 2019 9:44 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 2:23 am
A family in London who receive around £82 million in state benefits have had another baby despite its father not having a proper job.
The mixed-race child, which is expected to live off the public purse for its whole life, has not yet been named but Alexander is apparently the front runner.
The child's 93-year-old great grandmother has received welfare ever since she was born in 1926 despite having a large private income.
The child's immigrant mother left a promising career to come into the country to live off state handouts and take advantage of our free healthcare services.
:lol:
That's a little funny.

I think Megan Markle is poison to the British Crown. It's sad, I had hopes for Harry.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
DrYouth
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Canadastan

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by DrYouth » Tue May 07, 2019 11:09 am

Isn't it sort of degrading to the royal family to be useless dependents like this that nooone actually takes seriously...

The whole thing is messed up.

What's your position on this for real Monte?

Does the British Monarchy serve a purpose?
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Tue May 07, 2019 1:30 pm

DrYouth wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 11:09 am
Isn't it sort of degrading to the royal family to be useless dependents like this that nooone actually takes seriously...

The whole thing is messed up.

What's your position on this for real Monte?

Does the British Monarchy serve a purpose?
My position for real is that I oppose a hereditary head of state on principle but accept that it is better than the alternatives so support it until a better system can be presented.
A non-political head of state who is respected by the vast majority of the population is far better than a partisan head of state disliked by half the population.
In terms of the cost to the public, it is such a small figure per head of the population and is mostly spent on maintaining our heritage (castles, palaces, golden coaches etc) that I willingly pay my 69 pence.
Buckingham Palace has released its annual accounts, revealing just how much money is being spent to maintain royal residences and lifting the lid on the royal family’s biggest spenders. The figures, which cover April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018, reveal that the Queen received a 13 percent pay raise, though she’s not the biggest spender in the family.

The royal family cost each British taxpayer 69 pence last year (up 4 pence compared to last year), with courtiers insisting the royal family is “excellent value for money.” The royal family’s independent commercial property arm, the Crown Estate, also returned £329.4 million to the public Treasury in the last year, a £12.7 million increase from the year before.
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2018/0 ... mily-costs
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image