Huh? You a climatologist? Monty certainly isn't. Are you claiming that you aren't clueless regarding this subject?DrYouth wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 8:23 amNow there's an interesting argument...Haumana wrote: Thu May 09, 2019 7:26 pm Naa. I would rather you pretend you even have the slightest inkling that you know what you are talking about. Fact is that you don't know shit and neither do I. Difference is that I don't pretend to know.
I'm clueless, so you must be too.
Everybody knows nothing.... end of argument.
Self defeating but creative.
Climate Denier Hard To Refute
-
- Posts: 4195
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am
Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute
Judging by actual predictive performance, I'd argue that Python's random.randrange() function would produce more accurate predictions than so-called climate "scientists".
Building a model in of itself is not science either. You use models to test your hypothesis against real data, not to point to the model output like that's reality. FFS
Building a model in of itself is not science either. You use models to test your hypothesis against real data, not to point to the model output like that's reality. FFS
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute
So now we admit climatologists are the ones who know best?Haumana wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 12:29 pmHuh? You a climatologist? Monty certainly isn't. Are you claiming that you aren't clueless regarding this subject?DrYouth wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 8:23 amNow there's an interesting argument...Haumana wrote: Thu May 09, 2019 7:26 pm Naa. I would rather you pretend you even have the slightest inkling that you know what you are talking about. Fact is that you don't know shit and neither do I. Difference is that I don't pretend to know.
I'm clueless, so you must be too.
Everybody knows nothing.... end of argument.
Self defeating but creative.
Halle-fucking-lujah.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
- Location: Canadastan
Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute
Montegriffo wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 2:28 pm So now we admit climatologists are the ones who know best?
Halle-fucking-lujah.

Well played.
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty
-
- Posts: 19122
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute
Only Climate Scientists, celebrities & Democrats understand Climate Science.
Nobody takes my advice but goddamn Climate Scientists are the shit. Fuck you.
Nobody takes my advice but goddamn Climate Scientists are the shit. Fuck you.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute
Appeals to authority are a helluva drug.Martin Hash wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 9:32 pm Only Climate Scientists, celebrities & Democrats understand Climate Science.
Nobody takes my advice but goddamn Climate Scientists are the shit. Fuck you.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute
Says the man who claims to be the authority on what TV to watch.StCapps wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 10:56 pmAppeals to authority are a helluva drug.Martin Hash wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 9:32 pm Only Climate Scientists, celebrities & Democrats understand Climate Science.
Nobody takes my advice but goddamn Climate Scientists are the shit. Fuck you.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute
That's not why you should listen to me though. It's the strength of my opinions that makes me an authority on TV, not the strength of my authority that makes my opinions worth listening to. The argument is more important than the person making it, and it's on that basis that you should judge my TV expertise.Montegriffo wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 11:49 pmSays the man who claims to be the authority on what TV to watch.StCapps wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 10:56 pmAppeals to authority are a helluva drug.Martin Hash wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 9:32 pm Only Climate Scientists, celebrities & Democrats understand Climate Science.
Nobody takes my advice but goddamn Climate Scientists are the shit. Fuck you.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute
Exactly the reason I take the word of a climatologist over you.StCapps wrote: Sat May 11, 2019 12:03 amThat's not why you should listen to me though. It's the strength of my opinions that makes me an authority on TV, not the strength of my authority that makes my opinions worth listening to. The argument is more important than the person making it, and it's on that basis that you should judge my TV expertise.Montegriffo wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 11:49 pmSays the man who claims to be the authority on what TV to watch.
The Wire has several glaring flaws by the way.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute
Computer models are not the object of science. You use models to test hypotheses against real data and them compare the results with observed phenomena. You don't just point at the model like that's the thing you are studying.