Climate Denier Hard To Refute

User avatar
Haumana
Posts: 4027
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am

Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute

Post by Haumana » Fri May 10, 2019 12:29 pm

DrYouth wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 8:23 am
Haumana wrote:
Thu May 09, 2019 7:26 pm
Naa. I would rather you pretend you even have the slightest inkling that you know what you are talking about. Fact is that you don't know shit and neither do I. Difference is that I don't pretend to know.
Now there's an interesting argument...

I'm clueless, so you must be too.

Everybody knows nothing.... end of argument.

Self defeating but creative.
Huh? You a climatologist? Monty certainly isn't. Are you claiming that you aren't clueless regarding this subject?

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri May 10, 2019 12:54 pm

Judging by actual predictive performance, I'd argue that Python's random.randrange() function would produce more accurate predictions than so-called climate "scientists".

Building a model in of itself is not science either. You use models to test your hypothesis against real data, not to point to the model output like that's reality. FFS

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute

Post by Montegriffo » Fri May 10, 2019 2:28 pm

Haumana wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 12:29 pm
DrYouth wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 8:23 am
Haumana wrote:
Thu May 09, 2019 7:26 pm
Naa. I would rather you pretend you even have the slightest inkling that you know what you are talking about. Fact is that you don't know shit and neither do I. Difference is that I don't pretend to know.
Now there's an interesting argument...

I'm clueless, so you must be too.

Everybody knows nothing.... end of argument.

Self defeating but creative.
Huh? You a climatologist? Monty certainly isn't. Are you claiming that you aren't clueless regarding this subject?
So now we admit climatologists are the ones who know best?
Halle-fucking-lujah.

For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
DrYouth
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Canadastan

Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute

Post by DrYouth » Fri May 10, 2019 4:22 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 2:28 pm
So now we admit climatologists are the ones who know best?
Halle-fucking-lujah.
:lol:

Well played.
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18260
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute

Post by Martin Hash » Fri May 10, 2019 9:32 pm

Only Climate Scientists, celebrities & Democrats understand Climate Science.

Nobody takes my advice but goddamn Climate Scientists are the shit. Fuck you.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute

Post by StCapps » Fri May 10, 2019 10:56 pm

Martin Hash wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 9:32 pm
Only Climate Scientists, celebrities & Democrats understand Climate Science.

Nobody takes my advice but goddamn Climate Scientists are the shit. Fuck you.
Appeals to authority are a helluva drug.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute

Post by Montegriffo » Fri May 10, 2019 11:49 pm

StCapps wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 10:56 pm
Martin Hash wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 9:32 pm
Only Climate Scientists, celebrities & Democrats understand Climate Science.

Nobody takes my advice but goddamn Climate Scientists are the shit. Fuck you.
Appeals to authority are a helluva drug.
Says the man who claims to be the authority on what TV to watch.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute

Post by StCapps » Sat May 11, 2019 12:03 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 11:49 pm
StCapps wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 10:56 pm
Martin Hash wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 9:32 pm
Only Climate Scientists, celebrities & Democrats understand Climate Science.

Nobody takes my advice but goddamn Climate Scientists are the shit. Fuck you.
Appeals to authority are a helluva drug.
Says the man who claims to be the authority on what TV to watch.
That's not why you should listen to me though. It's the strength of my opinions that makes me an authority on TV, not the strength of my authority that makes my opinions worth listening to. The argument is more important than the person making it, and it's on that basis that you should judge my TV expertise.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute

Post by Montegriffo » Sat May 11, 2019 12:08 am

StCapps wrote:
Sat May 11, 2019 12:03 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 11:49 pm
StCapps wrote:
Fri May 10, 2019 10:56 pm
Appeals to authority are a helluva drug.
Says the man who claims to be the authority on what TV to watch.
That's not why you should listen to me though. It's the strength of my opinions that makes me an authority on TV, not the strength of my authority that makes my opinions worth listening to. The argument is more important than the person making it, and it's on that basis that you should judge my TV expertise.
Exactly the reason I take the word of a climatologist over you.
The Wire has several glaring flaws by the way.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Climate Denier Hard To Refute

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat May 11, 2019 12:09 am

Computer models are not the object of science. You use models to test hypotheses against real data and them compare the results with observed phenomena. You don't just point at the model like that's the thing you are studying.