UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Speaker to Animals »

Montegriffo wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 9:03 am Again, criticism is not hatred.
Stop playing your victim card or you will wear it out.
Tell that to your government who imprisons ethnic English for criticizing Islam.
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18819
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo »

Speaker to Animals wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 9:09 am
Montegriffo wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 9:03 am Again, criticism is not hatred.
Stop playing your victim card or you will wear it out.
Tell that to your government who imprisons ethnic English for criticizing Islam.
Not for criticising Islam. If you are referring to Tommy Robinson (not his real name) he was charged with contempt of court which you damn well know.

You can criticise Islamic terrorism, what you cannot do is say Muslims are all terrorists.
Likewise, I can criticise Catholic terrorists but cannot claim that all Catholics are terrorists (or paedophiles).
Death, death, to the IDF.

Image
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Speaker to Animals »

That is exactly what we are saying. Your characterize criticism of Islam or homosexuality as "hate speech", and literal hate speech against Christianity as "criticism".


Get fucked, faggot. Fuck your blasphemy laws.
PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by PartyOf5 »

Montegriffo wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 8:24 am
Hate speech laws in England and Wales are found in several statutes. Expressions of hatred toward someone on account of that person's colour, race, disability, nationality (including citizenship), ethnic or national origin, religion, gender identity, or sexual orientation is forbidden. Any communication which is threatening or abusive, and is intended to harass, alarm, or distress someone is forbidden
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_spee ... ed_Kingdom
All they had to do was keep the last part "Any communication which is threatening or abusive, and is intended to harass, alarm, or distress someone is forbidden" and ditch the first part to improve it.

I wonder if anyone in the UK has been arrested for saying they hate Americans. According to their law, they should be.
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18819
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo »

Speaker to Animals wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 9:22 am That is exactly what we are saying. Your characterize criticism of Islam or homosexuality as "hate speech", and literal hate speech against Christianity as "criticism".


Get fucked, faggot. Fuck your blasphemy laws.
Don't twist my words. I know exactly what I said.
You are a sensitive soul who sees criticism of Christianity as hatred to support your victimhood status.
If you think I've posted hate speech against Christianity prove it.
Put up or shut up.
Death, death, to the IDF.

Image
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Speaker to Animals »

I am not going to search through your long post history of nonsense. We all have seen you post hate speech against Christians. I don't really give a shit other than to point out your hypocrisy when you demand blasphemy laws for your own religion while counter-signaling age-old blasphemy laws that Christians long ago abandoned.
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18819
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo »

PartyOf5 wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 9:29 am
Montegriffo wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 8:24 am
Hate speech laws in England and Wales are found in several statutes. Expressions of hatred toward someone on account of that person's colour, race, disability, nationality (including citizenship), ethnic or national origin, religion, gender identity, or sexual orientation is forbidden. Any communication which is threatening or abusive, and is intended to harass, alarm, or distress someone is forbidden
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_spee ... ed_Kingdom
All they had to do was keep the last part "Any communication which is threatening or abusive, and is intended to harass, alarm, or distress someone is forbidden" and ditch the first part to improve it.

I wonder if anyone in the UK has been arrested for saying they hate Americans. According to their law, they should be.
Islamic preachers have certainly faced prosecution for preaching hatred against America and the West.
Death, death, to the IDF.

Image
User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4653
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by pineapplemike »

we should make it a hate crime to take the lord's name in vain if we're going to make it a hate crime to draw the goddamn prophet muhammed
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18819
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo »

Speaker to Animals wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 9:57 am I am not going to search through your long post history of nonsense. We all have seen you post hate speech against Christians.
No you haven't and your reluctance to look for examples shows you doubt the truth of what you say.
Criticism is not hatred under UK law.

Put up or shut up.
Death, death, to the IDF.

Image
User avatar
Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Kath »

Montegriffo wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 8:48 am
Kath wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 8:41 am
Montegriffo wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 8:36 am
Ps. Those sound like restrictions on their freedom of speech, something I was told means you have no freedom of speech.
My right of free speech doesn't come with a right to a venue.
Sounds like a restriction on free speech to me.
No. The right to speak is not the same as having the right to speak wherever you want. Someone can't just come in my home uninvited and spew. You can't go into a courtroom and spew. There are numerous venues where free speech rights cannot be practiced.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?