You misguidedly believe that you are helping, but you are actually hurting, and are blind to the results of your supported policies. Counter-productivity incarnate, that's you.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 1:52 pmIf you say so.StCapps wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 1:37 pmBanning it would lead to them seeking out the videos even more often, and radicalize even more people, so banning free speech doesn't solve that problem, dumbass. You are empowering ISIS and the far-right by restricting their right to free speech, not disempowering them.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 1:34 pm
Right, 'cos no one has ever been radicalised by watching endless ISIS videos preaching hate against the West.
derp
You only care about feeling like you are helping, results of your supported policies be damned. As long as you feel better, that's all that matters to you.
I don't know where I'd be without you to tell me what matters to me.
UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
If you say so.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
Yet you are supporting suppressing free speech, based on completely misguided beliefs, and you think that justifies not airing on the side of free speech. The tyrannical control freak in you leading you astray, yet again.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
If you say so.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
You know, if you're going to have a strong opinion about restricting free speech, you should at least look for a better reason, than the bullshit you spout now. It's not like banning something that has nothing to do with fundamental freedoms that are a pillar of western civilization, stop pretending it's just like banning speeding or some shit, it's absolutely nowhere close to the same thing.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
If you say so.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
Let's pretend that banning hate speech is just like banning any other crime, as if murder is fundamental human right just like free speech or some shit. Herpa Derp.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
I'm still busy pretending that only your opinion is valid and all others are due to control freakery.
In order to save time and effort, I'll just repeat 'if you say so'.
In order to save time and effort, I'll just repeat 'if you say so'.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
Your knee jerk reaction is to ban what you don't like, even if it's a fundamental human freedom, and you have no good reason to do so. That's called being a control freak.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 4:14 pmI'm still busy pretending that only your opinion is valid and all others are due to control freakery.
In order to save time and effort, I'll just repeat 'if you say so'.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby
Hate speech is not a fundamental human freedom. It serves no positive benefit and can lead the weak minded to commit hate crimes.
Hate is a recruitment tool for radicalisation.
Hate is a recruitment tool for radicalisation.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.