UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue May 07, 2019 1:31 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 5:41 am
Kath wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 5:19 am
Lol

I didn't hear about it. Was it on the news? I thought that baby was months away.
7lb 3 oz boy born 5.25am local time yesterday.
Trump has not been accused of colluding with Harry so that is probably why you have not heard about it.
Did you just assume its gender?

Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Kath » Tue May 07, 2019 1:34 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 9:44 am

I think Megan Markle is poison to the British Crown. It's sad, I had hopes for Harry.
Why? By all accounts, she is a lovely person. I loved her while she was on Suits. That show provided me quite the guilty pleasure.
Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 1:30 pm
it is such a small figure per head of the population and is mostly spent on maintaining our heritage (castles, palaces, golden coaches etc) that I willingly pay my 69 pence.
That's actually ridiculously cheap. It's not as if they are sitting on their asses all day. I couldn't imagine a more shitty life for myself. Blech.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Tue May 07, 2019 1:36 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 1:31 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 5:41 am
Kath wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 5:19 am
Lol

I didn't hear about it. Was it on the news? I thought that baby was months away.
7lb 3 oz boy born 5.25am local time yesterday.
Trump has not been accused of colluding with Harry so that is probably why you have not heard about it.
Did you just assume its gender?
No, I merely repeated the gender assigned to him by his parents.
If in later life he/she decides to transition I will fully support him/her in his/her choice.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by C-Mag » Tue May 07, 2019 1:39 pm

Kath wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 1:34 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 9:44 am

I think Megan Markle is poison to the British Crown. It's sad, I had hopes for Harry.
Why? By all accounts, she is a lovely person. I loved her while she was on Suits. That show provided me quite the guilty pleasure.
I see her and she seems to be a Kardashian type life wrecker. Sex must be fucking outstanding, because Harry could have picked any woman in England and 50% of the women in the world and he ended up with that.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Tue May 07, 2019 1:40 pm

Kath wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 1:34 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 1:30 pm
it is such a small figure per head of the population and is mostly spent on maintaining our heritage (castles, palaces, golden coaches etc) that I willingly pay my 69 pence.
That's actually ridiculously cheap. It's not as if they are sitting on their asses all day. I couldn't imagine a more shitty life for myself. Blech.
Exactly, How many other 93 year-old great grandmothers still work every day.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Kath » Tue May 07, 2019 1:50 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 1:39 pm

I see her and she seems to be a Kardashian type life wrecker. Sex must be fucking outstanding, because Harry could have picked any woman in England and 50% of the women in the world and he ended up with that.
Ah. I don't see that at all. What has she done to make you think that? She certainly has a family full of assholes, but she wants nothing to do with them. (Only her mother, who is a sweetheart, by all accounts available.)
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?

User avatar
DrYouth
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Canadastan

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by DrYouth » Tue May 07, 2019 1:55 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 1:30 pm
A non-political head of state who is respected by the vast majority of the population is far better than a partisan head of state disliked by half the population.
But what happens if and when the majority of the population don't respect this non-political head of state...
I mean this is bound to happen eventually.
Sure Queen Elly is a top notch old gal... but her son would most likely inspire much less respect... a dud will eventually rise to the throne.
How will y'all deal with such a crisis in this day and age do you figure?
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Montegriffo » Tue May 07, 2019 2:08 pm

DrYouth wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 1:55 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 1:30 pm
A non-political head of state who is respected by the vast majority of the population is far better than a partisan head of state disliked by half the population.
But what happens if and when the majority of the population don't respect this non-political head of state...
I mean this is bound to happen eventually.
Sure Queen Elly is a top notch old gal... but her son would most likely inspire much less respect... a dud will eventually rise to the throne.
How will y'all deal with such a crisis in this day and age do you figure?
In such circumstances, we would petition our elected representatives to remove them as head of state and become a republic. However, since the Monarch has no real political power to affect the lives of the public it seems unlikely that would happen.
Charles is a bit of a dick but hardly a tyrant. William is generally pretty well liked though so we'd probably just cross our fingers and hope Charles' reign doesn't last too long.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by Kath » Tue May 07, 2019 2:24 pm

DrYouth wrote:
Tue May 07, 2019 1:55 pm

But what happens if and when the majority of the population don't respect this non-political head of state...
I mean this is bound to happen eventually.
Sure Queen Elly is a top notch old gal... but her son would most likely inspire much less respect... a dud will eventually rise to the throne.
How will y'all deal with such a crisis in this day and age do you figure?
Psst... she's your queen, too. :-)
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?

heydaralon
Posts: 7571
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm

Re: UK's biggest welfare family have another baby

Post by heydaralon » Tue May 07, 2019 2:26 pm

Fuck the Royal Family. Fuck Princess Diana. I heard that the emergency rescue team had to spend two hours hosing that limo out because Princess Di shit her pants when she died in the crash. They set up a cordon sanitaire because her feces might have been contaminated with AIDS when she touched that gay guy's hand without a glove.
Shikata ga nai