-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:33 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:22 am
Why not just lock them up when they actually commit violent crime?
The idea is to prevent violent crime.
Just waiting for violent crime to happen leads to violent crime.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:34 am
Martin, what is in the code?
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:36 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:33 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:22 am
Why not just lock them up when they actually commit violent crime?
The idea is to prevent violent crime.
Just waiting for violent crime to happen leads to violent crime.
You want to imprison people because they
might commit violent crime?
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:39 am
UK pre-crime unit on red alert.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:42 am
Martin Hash wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 8:13 am
I received an email from the local Democrat Party (of which I am no longer a member) that is chillingly Orwellian:
"The Washington State Democratic party adopted this code of conduct and has asked all local political party organizations to adopt it as well. This code sets the basic expectations for conduct and behavior by our party members in dealing with each other and the general public. The procedures document establishes an objective protocol and method for handling complaints from our members on others who they believe have violated the code."
Screenshot? It's not that I don't believe you, but this would be huge and should be newsworthy if this is legit.
#NotOneRedCent
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:44 am
Depends on the code itself. A code of conduct by itself is not bad if reasonable.
-
Martin Hash
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Post
by Martin Hash » Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:31 am
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
Martin Hash
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Post
by Martin Hash » Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:33 am
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:38 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:36 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:33 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:22 am
Why not just lock them up when they actually commit violent crime?
The idea is to prevent violent crime.
Just waiting for violent crime to happen leads to violent crime.
You want to imprison people because they
might commit violent crime?
No. I want to stop people inciting violent crime.
30 years of sectarian violence is enough.
Chanting about the Battle of the Boyne to a bunch of Catholics is incitement.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:39 am
Bahahaha. What a bunch of fags.