President Andrew Yang

[DBTrek]

UBI is a stupid idea, period.

EVERYONE starting out with $0 and working for more money is the same as EVERYONE starting with $5,000,000 and working for more.
A fast food burger is, what, like $1.49? If everyone gets $5mil, it'll be $1.49 PLUS the cost inflation of EVERYONE starting at $5mil instead of zero.

How is this not clear to people?
Or better yet . . . how come no one calls bullshit on these cities and nations that "test" UBI by giving money to a sample set of 500 people? The 'U' in UBI stands for UNIVERSAL, dummies. If you aren't "testing" it out on EVERYONE then you aren't testing UBI. You're testing giving a few hundred people more money. Derp.

Everyone knows when you give a few hundred people more money, then those few hundred have more buying power. When you give EVERYONE the same amount of money, prices will simply adjust to everyone's new economic starting point of $X instead of $0.

[StCapps]

UBI is a stupid idea, period.

EVERYONE starting out with $0 and working for more money is the same as EVERYONE starting with $5,000,000 and working for more.
A fast food burger is, what, like $1.49? If everyone gets $5mil, it'll be $1.49 PLUS the cost inflation of EVERYONE starting at $5mil instead of zero.

How is this not clear to people?
Or better yet . . . how come no one calls bullshit on these cities and nations that "test" UBI by giving money to a sample set of 500 people? The 'U' in UBI stands for UNIVERSAL, dummies. If you aren't "testing" it out on EVERYONE then you aren't testing UBI. You're testing giving a few hundred people more money. Derp.

Everyone knows when you give a few hundred people more money, then those few hundred have more buying power. When you give EVERYONE the same amount of money, prices will simply adjust to everyone's new economic starting point of $X instead of $0.

And that new economic starting point, results in more spending, which drives economic growth. Can't spend $0.

Stimulus for only the banks does not work as well as stimulus for all, freedom dividend ftw.

[Smitty-48]

Get dat blang, Dukenogs.

Everybody else be getting the blang, why not you, Whitey?

[StCapps]

Negative Income Tax, is simply another form of UBI, if you want to do it that way instead, I'm down, and so is Milton Friedman.

[Smitty-48]

Negative Income Tax, is simply another form of UBI, if you want to do it that way instead, I'm down, and so is Milton Friedman.

Exactly.

Get dat blang.

Milton Friedman, yo.

[StCapps]

Even your boy Thomas Sowell is for a Negative Income Tax. Wise up, DBTrek.


Get Dat Blang. Secure The Bag.

[DBTrek]

UBI is a stupid idea, period.

EVERYONE starting out with $0 and working for more money is the same as EVERYONE starting with $5,000,000 and working for more.
A fast food burger is, what, like $1.49? If everyone gets $5mil, it'll be $1.49 PLUS the cost inflation of EVERYONE starting at $5mil instead of zero.

How is this not clear to people?
Or better yet . . . how come no one calls bullshit on these cities and nations that "test" UBI by giving money to a sample set of 500 people? The 'U' in UBI stands for UNIVERSAL, dummies. If you aren't "testing" it out on EVERYONE then you aren't testing UBI. You're testing giving a few hundred people more money. Derp.

Everyone knows when you give a few hundred people more money, then those few hundred have more buying power. When you give EVERYONE the same amount of money, prices will simply adjust to everyone's new economic starting point of $X instead of $0.

And that new economic starting point, results in more spending, which drives economic growth. Can't spend $0.

Stimulus for only the banks does not work as well as stimulus for all, freedom dividend ftw.

Whether you buy a burger for $1.49, or for an adjusted $10,241.79 for it (because everyone starts with $5mil) is irrelevant. You still bought one burger. Using a wheelbarrow full of money to pay for it hasn't driven any more spending.

[StCapps]

UBI is a stupid idea, period.

EVERYONE starting out with $0 and working for more money is the same as EVERYONE starting with $5,000,000 and working for more.
A fast food burger is, what, like $1.49? If everyone gets $5mil, it'll be $1.49 PLUS the cost inflation of EVERYONE starting at $5mil instead of zero.

How is this not clear to people?
Or better yet . . . how come no one calls bullshit on these cities and nations that "test" UBI by giving money to a sample set of 500 people? The 'U' in UBI stands for UNIVERSAL, dummies. If you aren't "testing" it out on EVERYONE then you aren't testing UBI. You're testing giving a few hundred people more money. Derp.

Everyone knows when you give a few hundred people more money, then those few hundred have more buying power. When you give EVERYONE the same amount of money, prices will simply adjust to everyone's new economic starting point of $X instead of $0.

And that new economic starting point, results in more spending, which drives economic growth. Can't spend $0.

Stimulus for only the banks does not work as well as stimulus for all, freedom dividend ftw.

Whether you buy a burger for $1.49, or for an adjusted $10,241.79 for it (because everyone starts with $5mil) is irrelevant. You still bought one burger. Using a wheelbarrow full of money to pay for it hasn't driven any more spending.

Your boy, Thomas Sowell disagrees. See above video.

[DBTrek]

Even your boy Thomas Sowell is for a Negative Income Tax. Wise up, DBTrek.


Get Dat Blang. Secure The Bag.

Negative income tax isn't UBI.
You and the trust funder wise up, and stay in your lanes.

[StCapps]

Even your boy Thomas Sowell is for a Negative Income Tax. Wise up, DBTrek.


Get Dat Blang. Secure The Bag.

Negative income tax isn't UBI.
You and the trust funder wise up, and stay in your lanes.

It's the same thing, faggot. Same concept, slightly different implementation, your hair splitting aside.