Actually, since you deem human life more valuable than pigs, and by your own logic, being created to be tortured is better for the subjective individual than to have not existed, it follows that breeding humans for slavery is even better than breeding pigs for meat. That's your reasoning, come to bite you in the ass.And a terrible one.
Plutarch on animal ethics
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
No by my logic, humans life being more valuable, means that we shouldn't eat humans, but we should eat pigs, because their lives are not valuable enough to warrant never killing them for food, human lives on the other hand are more valuable than that.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:34 amActually, since you deem human life more valuable than pigs, and by your own logic, being created to be tortured is better for the subjective individual than to have not existed, it follows that breeding humans for slavery is even better than breeding pigs for meat. That's your reasoning, come to bite you in the ass.And a terrible one.
Also, I am clearly not for torturing pigs, I want them killed as cleanly as possible, and for their lives before they are killed to not be torturous.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
Why would "they" fix anything, when you're handing them your money?
Supply and demand, you understand it?
Out with the demand, out with the supply. Going vegan is how you let them know it's time to "fix things." Once they "fix things" and animal agriculture chucks the animal abuse and the environmental destruction, you can get back to it, eh?
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
There are other ways to get them to fix things than going vegan, going vegan isn't stopping them from doing shit, the rest of the world isn't going to go vegan, me going vegan isn't about to make them rethink fuck all.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:38 amWhy would "they" fix anything, when you're handing them your money?
Supply and demand, you understand it?
Out with the demand, out with the supply. Going vegan is how you let them know it's time to "fix things." Once they "fix things" and animal agriculture chucks the animal abuse and the environmental destruction, you can get back to it, eh?
If you want to delude yourself into thinking that going vegan is going to help, whatever helps you sleep at night, but that doesn't mean you are actually helping, you just feel like you are, and there is a big difference.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
Yes, they should.
Factory farming should not exist.
You just aren't prepared to give up cheap meat. Just like you are not prepared to pay for a lower carbon footprint.
Shitty self-interests getting in the way of a better life for all.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
Yes by your logic, you were saying it's better for the pigs to be bred for slaughter than to have never been bred, because their lives are valuable in and of themselves, no matter what happens. If pig lives are that precious, how much more so human lives? To breed human slaves is practically a moral imperative, by such unassailable logic.StCapps wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:37 amNo by my logic, humans life being more valuable, means that we shouldn't eat humans, but we should eat pigs, because their lives are not valuable enough to warrant never killing them for food, human lives on the other hand are more valuable than that.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:34 amActually, since you deem human life more valuable than pigs, and by your own logic, being created to be tortured is better for the subjective individual than to have not existed, it follows that breeding humans for slavery is even better than breeding pigs for meat. That's your reasoning, come to bite you in the ass.And a terrible one.
Also, I am clearly not for torturing pigs, I want them killed as cleanly as possible, and for their lives before they are killed to not be torturous.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
No, they shouldn't. Your self-interests do not Trump the self-interests of meat eaters. The only one standing in the way of better life for all, are the people wanting to throw the baby out with the bathwater.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:43 amYes, they should.
Factory farming should not exist.
You just aren't prepared to give up cheap meat. Just like you are not prepared to pay for a lower carbon footprint.
Shitty self-interests getting in the way of a better life for all.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
Mate, meat consumption keeps going down, while the vegan population keeps increasing, that's a message we're sending em, and they're getting scared, you want to be a part of the solution, yeah?StCapps wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:39 amThere are other ways to get them to fix things than going vegan, going vegan isn't stopping them from doing shit, the rest of the world isn't going to go vegan, me going vegan isn't about to make them rethink fuck all.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:38 amWhy would "they" fix anything, when you're handing them your money?
Supply and demand, you understand it?
Out with the demand, out with the supply. Going vegan is how you let them know it's time to "fix things." Once they "fix things" and animal agriculture chucks the animal abuse and the environmental destruction, you can get back to it, eh?
If you want to delude yourself into thinking that going vegan is going to help, whatever helps you sleep at night, but that doesn't mean you are actually helping, you just feel like you are, and there is a big difference.
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
"The only ones standing in the way of a better life for all, are the ones that won't give their money to the meat industry!"StCapps wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:45 amNo, they shouldn't. Your self-interests do not Trump the self-interests of meat eaters. The only one standing in the way of better life for all, are the people wanting to throw the baby out with the bathwater.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 4:43 amYes, they should.
Factory farming should not exist.
You just aren't prepared to give up cheap meat. Just like you are not prepared to pay for a lower carbon footprint.
Shitty self-interests getting in the way of a better life for all.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Plutarch on animal ethics
No it isn't. Slavery resulted in a lower birth rate, especially when talking about the American version. Enslaving humans is immoral, enslaving pigs isn't, human lives are more valuable, if you want to make the idiotic argument that pigs lives are just as valuable as humans, the holes in that logic are your own, I don't subscribe to that view.
*yip*