Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 12:19 pm
Do you know for a fact that verifying the alcohol content is not part of their remit? If not the labelling authority then who does perform that task?
Brewer submits ingredient list and process, but not product.
You may find this of interest:
http://freedombunker.com/2019/01/09/gov ... er-labels/
The other problem with the TTB is a First Amendment one. As Greg Beato pointed out in a 2008 feature for Reason, the TTB routinely denies certain labels for alcoholic beverages that would be considered perfectly fine to slap on any other product. "If you're a perfume manufacturer and you'd like to name your latest fragrance Opium, no government agent will stop you," he wrote. "The world's flagship soda is called Coke. A company called Chronic Candy has been selling lollipops flavored with cannabis flower essential oil for eight years."
But the TTB has used vague statues to justify blocking labels for beers that make references, usually, to drugs. In 2016, for example, a Minnesota-based brewery was told it could not sell a beer made with lavender extract, sunflower oil, and dates as "LSD Ale." The exact same product, though, is perfectly legal to be sold under the name "Lavender Sunflower Date Honey Ale," which is what Indeed Brewing Company ended up calling it. By any other name, right?
I don't care what people name their beer. Let the free market sort it out. It always does (well, whenever government gets out of the way.)