The Armory - Guns, Knives, and Axes
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: The Armory - Guns, Knives, and Axes
What the Spitfires did was fly inches below the V1 wingtip to wingtip which disturbed the airflow over it and caused them to spiral down into the channel or simply veer off course. Brave AF and highly skilled.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:55 pmI dunno. He might have had to tip it nose down with his wingMontegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:30 pmDid it actually shoot them down or tip them like Spitfires did?
I thought they were too dangerous to shoot as you would fly into the explosion and damage your plane.
Only known image...
https://www.forces.net/radio/did-spitfi ... bs-out-sky
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: The Armory - Guns, Knives, and Axes
The records indicate the Meteors opened fire on them.
That photo of the Spitfire is bad ass, though. That rocket was going to level some homes. Imagine climbing out of the cockpit after that.
That photo of the Spitfire is bad ass, though. That rocket was going to level some homes. Imagine climbing out of the cockpit after that.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: The Armory - Guns, Knives, and Axes
Don't know how the pilot was able to sit down with balls that big.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:29 pmThe records indicate the Meteors opened fire on them.
That photo of the Spitfire is bad ass, though. That rocket was going to level some homes. Imagine climbing out of the cockpit after that.
I think the problem with shooting them down was that you had to be far enough away from them to not fly into the debris which made them hard to hit. They often ran out of ammo. Spitfires only had about 13 seconds worth of bullets.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: The Armory - Guns, Knives, and Axes
Probably because the max level speed the Spitfire could achieve at that altitude was only a little faster than the V1 rocket. I am not sure what the Meteor could actually pull at 30-40k feet, but Wikipedia says it's "top speed" reached 460 mph. Not very helpful terminology or unit of measurement, but most likely it easily outpaced a V1 with the throttles pushed past mil. So I'd imagine he'd pull up behind, crank out of a few bursts, push the throttles and roll out of the way.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:42 pmDon't know how the pilot was able to sit down with balls that big.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:29 pmThe records indicate the Meteors opened fire on them.
That photo of the Spitfire is bad ass, though. That rocket was going to level some homes. Imagine climbing out of the cockpit after that.
I think the problem with shooting them down was that you had to be far enough away from them to not fly into the debris which made them hard to hit. They often ran out of ammo. Spitfires only had about 13 seconds worth of bullets.
He could also just come up underneath it. Or dive down on it. A few good possibilities. You'd have to ask a fighter pilot for specifics. I just fixed what they broke.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: The Armory - Guns, Knives, and Axes
Well that does answer the long-standing question I had about how wings achieve lift. I always figured it was pressure on the bottom of the wing, not vacuum above it.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:10 pmWhat the Spitfires did was fly inches below the V1 wingtip to wingtip which disturbed the airflow over it and caused them to spiral down into the channel or simply veer off course. Brave AF and highly skilled.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:55 pmI dunno. He might have had to tip it nose down with his wingMontegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:30 pm
Did it actually shoot them down or tip them like Spitfires did?
I thought they were too dangerous to shoot as you would fly into the explosion and damage your plane.
Only known image...
https://www.forces.net/radio/did-spitfi ... bs-out-sky
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: The Armory - Guns, Knives, and Axes
Monte
I am awaiting your surrender on the T 34 debate.
I'm ice fishing and expect it upon my return.
I am awaiting your surrender on the T 34 debate.
I'm ice fishing and expect it upon my return.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: The Armory - Guns, Knives, and Axes
The tank which won the war in Europe wasn't quite as good as some people think.
Happy now?
As for surrender, I'm British so I will verbally fight you on the beaches, on the landing grounds and in the fields. I shall never surrender.
Maybe you confused me for an Italian or a filthy Frenchman?
Ps, good luck catching some ice. Hopefully you are better at that than you are at shooting deer.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: The Armory - Guns, Knives, and Axes
Carlus is just helping to maintain the state monopoly on road construction.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: The Armory - Guns, Knives, and Axes
He removed (really, negated) lift from the right winglet, causing the rocket to most likely roll over to the right and then stall.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 10:38 pmWell that does answer the long-standing question I had about how wings achieve lift. I always figured it was pressure on the bottom of the wing, not vacuum above it.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:10 pmWhat the Spitfires did was fly inches below the V1 wingtip to wingtip which disturbed the airflow over it and caused them to spiral down into the channel or simply veer off course. Brave AF and highly skilled.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:55 pm
I dunno. He might have had to tip it nose down with his wing
Only known image...
https://www.forces.net/radio/did-spitfi ... bs-out-sky