Yes it is sad for me that you have no relevant argument.

Yes it is sad for me that you have no relevant argument.
In the case of the fire department, your "economic inefficiency" claim does not hold water, chickens and snakes not withstanding..Fife wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 4:41 pm Economic inefficiency and the immorality of coercion, for starters.
IMNSHO. Just my opinion. A majority of egg-sucking snakes voting against a minority of chickens may have a different view.
Just be mindful to stay in the favor of the majority of voters, I reckon.
Fife wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 4:49 pm A reasonable argument can be made that fire protection is a public good. And the opposite.
Fife wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:57 pm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_good
In economics, a public good is a good that is both non-excludable and non-rivalrous in that individuals cannot be effectively excluded from use and where use by one individual does not reduce availability to others.