Women make less because men work longer hours, duhhh...

[MilSpecs]

All the best technical writing omits links and citations to authority. Appellate courts love that kind of technical writing.

I’m not a lawyer - I write for the ease of the reader.

[DrYouth]

I think men tend to see women through a somewhat distorted lens, and perhaps the opposite is also true.

Ya think?

[Fife]

All the best technical writing omits links and citations to authority. Appellate courts love that kind of technical writing.

I’m not a lawyer - I write for the ease of the reader.

It doesn't do much for logical or empirical persuasion, but I'll grant you all day long that it's the way to go for writing funny stuff.

[MilSpecs]

All the best technical writing omits links and citations to authority. Appellate courts love that kind of technical writing.

I’m not a lawyer - I write for the ease of the reader.

It doesn't do much for logical or empirical persuasion, but I'll grant you all day long that it's the way to go for writing funny stuff.

A long string of posts and replies is lazy writing. Take the time to edit if possible.

[MilSpecs]

I’m not a lawyer - I write for the ease of the reader.

It doesn't do much for logical or empirical persuasion, but I'll grant you all day long that it's the way to go for writing funny stuff.

A long string of posts and replies is lazy writing. Take the time to edit if possible.

Edited to add: I don’t persuade in my professional life. I state facts and make declarations. When I write DANGER!, it is not meant to be amusing.

[MilSpecs]

I think men tend to see women through a somewhat distorted lens, and perhaps the opposite is also true.

Ya think?

Maybe.

[jediuser598]

The woman literally just took my post, removed my link to a woman's essay about women's unhappiness, quoted my response to that essay as if I were the one initially stating her argument, and then faked outrage that a man dare opine on what makes women happy.

That is utterly dishonest and an insult to our entire forum and yet you defend it.

Furthermore, it is sexist as fuck.

Yet here you are tone policing me for criticizing her lying because she cannot debate.

You are not some neutral arbiter of anything here. Kindly fuck off with that noise.

We have nukedog. This forum doesn't set a very high bar for content.

[jediuser598]

All the best technical writing omits links and citations to authority. Appellate courts love that kind of technical writing.

I’m not a lawyer - I write for the ease of the reader.

One could say diction is your whole game.

[MilSpecs]

All the best technical writing omits links and citations to authority. Appellate courts love that kind of technical writing.

I’m not a lawyer - I write for the ease of the reader.

One could say diction is your whole game.

If I could have a giant hand come out of my procedures and slap people while screaming “Don’t touch that!” I’d die a happy writer.

[Speaker to Animals]

Yet here you are tone policing me for criticizing her lying because she cannot debate.

You are not some neutral arbiter of anything here. Kindly fuck off with that noise.

Meh... who the fuck is neutral?

You are no paragon of debating skills.

You can make good arguments when you want to... but way too often you just fall back on the "lying" thing.

It's boring.

You can fuck right the fuck off with your criticism of me when we all know you did not even read what I wrote, and the poster you are trying to defend is without a doubt a contemptable liar.