"So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

[Zlaxer]

Why do you play by the rules Carl? You're doomed to loose.

I play by my own rules, what does winning on an internet forum even mean ?


No one learns anything from 10 pages of cheap backbiting and mud slinging, and it quickly becomes less than entertaining. Once the discussion becomes unproductive and the various parties views are locked, I usually step out. It's a waste of time.

You're having to explain obvious truths to a troll. Winning is realizing that they're either trolls or too fargone in their ideology to be worth the time of day.

[jediuser598]

Why do you play by the rules Carl? You're doomed to loose.

I play by my own rules, what does winning on an internet forum even mean ?


No one learns anything from 10 pages of cheap backbiting and mud slinging, and it quickly becomes less than entertaining. Once the discussion becomes unproductive and the various parties views are locked, I usually step out. It's a waste of time.

You're having to explain obvious truths to a troll. Winning is realizing that they're either trolls or too fargone in their ideology to be worth the time of day.

That projection though.

Need to put you at the back of a movie theatre and give their electric bill a break. You'd be getting CEOs bonuses, for all the money they'd save if you brought some of your equally clueless friends.

"This here is the zlaxer 2000. Runs on pure unaware ideology. We're going to save millions."

[pineapplemike]

I personally don't give a fuck about his affairs....just like I didn't give a fuck about Clinton's (until he lied about it)....If the Donald lied - then he should go down.

I hope he goes down - then maybe the non-Marxists will finally realize that Marxists don't play by the rules....and that they should not play by the rules anymore.

hey dude i'm confused, who were the marxists when clinton was impeached, and what rules were they playing by at the time? this trump investigation seems to be a repeat of the clinton affair, more or less, so it's the marxists that are copying the non-marxist's ruleset, no?

[Speaker to Animals]

It's not illegal to pay somebody to be quiet about an affair.

[Zlaxer]

I play by my own rules, what does winning on an internet forum even mean ?


No one learns anything from 10 pages of cheap backbiting and mud slinging, and it quickly becomes less than entertaining. Once the discussion becomes unproductive and the various parties views are locked, I usually step out. It's a waste of time.

You're having to explain obvious truths to a troll. Winning is realizing that they're either trolls or too fargone in their ideology to be worth the time of day.

That projection though.

Need to put you at the back of a movie theatre and give their electric bill a break. You'd be getting CEOs bonuses, for all the money they'd save if you brought some of your equally clueless friends.

"This here is the zlaxer 2000. Runs on pure unaware ideology. We're going to save millions."

no.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Do you believe in one standard for all in government, equal justice under the law ?

I believe that if I get caught paying off a hooker, I’ll go to jail.

Not in NV.

Had a really fucking hot one trying to pick me up in Vegas, but I wimped out. I thought it was illegal everywhere.

[SuburbanFarmer]

It's not illegal to pay somebody to be quiet about an affair.

Unless the money was agreed to beforehand.

[Speaker to Animals]

It's not illegal to pay somebody to be quiet about an affair.

Unless the money was agreed to beforehand.

LOL, no.

[PartyOf5]

C-mag, why are you always so respectful to me? Not sure what I've done to deserve it, lol.

Because he's not a hypocritical, snarky, trolling liberal like you. If you had any conservative values you wouldn't be so surprised by his actions.

[PartyOf5]

Hey Conservatives, how about those family values? Sanctity of marriage?

I live family values and sanctity of marriage. I don't need to elect someone as POTUS who lives those same values. In fact, I couldn't elect one. On one side you had Trump, who has done a whole lotta winning for conservatives. On the other you had a criminal who stood by her cheating man for decades and even worked to silence and destroy those her husband abused. Oh, and she would have done all harm and no good for the issues I wanted our next POTUS to address.